Tuesday, April 21st, 2009 09:10 pm
my happy is a cuddly and pornographic apolcalypse
On a topic completely unrelated to any current or near-current past events, it just occurred to me while pondering my reading is that Merlin has a very low proportion of uberangst. I mean, there is angst, but not like, the kind where you leave a story wanting to slit your own wrists in the bathtub afterward because, woe, the world is dark and all is doomed to love and despair, and even brownies soaked in chocolate fudge isn't going to help this.
...granted, this is because our (multiple) source ending is angsty as anything, so really, we're rebels and totally subverting the paradigm to synergize a new and exciting appropriation of the end game. I would like to encourage continuation of this trend.
I'd like to know if you are impressed with that sentence, too. I learned those words recently at an office meeting. I also learned you can't will yourself to death no matter how long you hold your breath. Odd, that.
...granted, this is because our (multiple) source ending is angsty as anything, so really, we're rebels and totally subverting the paradigm to synergize a new and exciting appropriation of the end game. I would like to encourage continuation of this trend.
I'd like to know if you are impressed with that sentence, too. I learned those words recently at an office meeting. I also learned you can't will yourself to death no matter how long you hold your breath. Odd, that.
no subject
From:We need more of this sort of thing, Arthur as the embodiment of the land, much euphemistic talk of plowing and furrowing and planting, some annointing with oils....
Yes. This.
It is of vital scholarly importance. We owe it to all who come after us.
A-hem.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I feel like I just lost a little of my life writing that sentence.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Arthur is the chalice. Merlin is the cup-bearer. All that spilling of "wine" during feasts, you know?
Also, man-wombs may just be the price we have to pay for shiny, happy apoca-fic.
Er, I mean, we may have to leverage the add-on value of masculine uterine-equivalents across the synergistic core competencies of end-game scenarios to maximize our survival in a post-crisis marketplace and ensure continuation of operations of key personnel.
...I hate you so much right now.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:That sentence is so amazing you can almost forget it's a defense of man-wombs.
...I hate you so much right now.
I kind of hate myself.
Masculine uterine-equivalents.
Just. Wow.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Now I want to see the COOP for Camelot.
THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT, JENN.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I feel we haven't fully explored the implications of the Quest for the Holy Grail as an organzing narrative for the Knights of the Round Table. Clearly, as a yonic signifier, the Grail indicates a Lacanian “lack” which the Knights are condemned to eternally seek. As the desired object, the grail may be safely inaccessible, allowing it to remain eternally desired, (the Zizekian implications are obvious and left as an exercise to the reader.)
Doubtless the Grail indicates the deferred longing for the feminine, which as knights and exemplars of masculinity, they are not permitted to embody in their gender or sex roles.
Thus, I hope I have demonstrated, grail == buttsecks.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:We may ask, then, what is the organising "lack" of Galahad's condition? I believe the obvious answer is the inability to fulfil the twin and opposed biological destinies of his dual nature; to impregnate, and to be impregnated, roles which in Camelot, surrounded by Knights seeking buttsecks, have no place.
There you go.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)