Monday, February 18th, 2013 10:13 am
i am not feeling good about this
This is venting.
After reading the Free Food Restaurant meta--context at FF_A since the original meta post at AO3 was deleted and replaced with an orphan account I can't find the link for--I:
1.) rediscovered the power of a secondhand embarrassment squick. I did not know anything could make me twitch that hard for someone than reading that meta.
2.) realized I have probably passed the point where if I flounced, I could do it in any way that could possibly qualify as original. Which is, honestly, a little depressing to consider.
3.) wonder just how well this entire adding meta to AO3 thing is going to work when there is not a system of forced categorization so when searching for fic, meta does not display. Since that is currently happening right now. As in, Free Food Restaurant is showing up under two fandoms and no meta tag in sight. Of course, I'm still hoping for the magical day I can filter out crossovers without giving myself an aneurysm doing a complicated tag thing that only works about half the time.
I mean, if this is going to be an honor system thing like labeling crossovers or hell, labeling pairings correctly--which I am completely shocked to report people don't do that all the time--this is very quickly going to be a problem. Unless we are implementing a way to require that before huge amounts of meta posting start? Which does not seem to be the case.
I don't want to knock AO3 here or anything, since this was obviously the result of a lot of thinking on the subject and everything, but I have yet to think of a good reason, an actual good reason not just a why-not reason, why meta, which is not even by a stretch of imagination quite beyond anyone living labor under the legal problems that fanfic does, should be included with fanworks--that being fanfic, vids, and any form of art--needs so desperately to be included in a fanworks archive. I am willing to stretch and say I consider it a non-fictional creative work--because well, it is--but couldn't it have it's own non-fictional creative work archive? A meta archive, you might say. Separate from the fic. Which in general, the archive was created to house? Just a thought.
Because in general, when I am in a reading fic mood, I am not technically interested in meta, and when sorting through a few hundred thousand fics to try to find non-crossover fandom of my choice with my pairing or pairings--which already requires me to start considering a blood sacrifice to shorten the process of horror--I now will have to watch for snowflake's feelings on a pairing not being labeled as meta.
Spoken as someone who is really not okay with the nightmare of having to figure out how run exclusion strings with not only crossovers, but every single pairing I don't like and now meta may need to be added, assuming the writer bothers to label it. That doesn't always work.
References
AO3 Announces Meta Allowed in Archive - link to AO3's announcement page
In case anyone wonders if the addition of meta has a plan on how it will be handled:
ETA:
Free Food Restaurant - AO3 meta. Okay, it's hilarious, stupid, and lists two fandoms without any meta tags whatsoever. And also, again, hilarious. Free food, y'all. Fic is like free food, but not in a clever way like hummus. (THANKS
cathexys!)
After reading the Free Food Restaurant meta--context at FF_A since the original meta post at AO3 was deleted and replaced with an orphan account I can't find the link for--I:
1.) rediscovered the power of a secondhand embarrassment squick. I did not know anything could make me twitch that hard for someone than reading that meta.
2.) realized I have probably passed the point where if I flounced, I could do it in any way that could possibly qualify as original. Which is, honestly, a little depressing to consider.
3.) wonder just how well this entire adding meta to AO3 thing is going to work when there is not a system of forced categorization so when searching for fic, meta does not display. Since that is currently happening right now. As in, Free Food Restaurant is showing up under two fandoms and no meta tag in sight. Of course, I'm still hoping for the magical day I can filter out crossovers without giving myself an aneurysm doing a complicated tag thing that only works about half the time.
I mean, if this is going to be an honor system thing like labeling crossovers or hell, labeling pairings correctly--which I am completely shocked to report people don't do that all the time--this is very quickly going to be a problem. Unless we are implementing a way to require that before huge amounts of meta posting start? Which does not seem to be the case.
I don't want to knock AO3 here or anything, since this was obviously the result of a lot of thinking on the subject and everything, but I have yet to think of a good reason, an actual good reason not just a why-not reason, why meta, which is not even by a stretch of imagination quite beyond anyone living labor under the legal problems that fanfic does, should be included with fanworks--that being fanfic, vids, and any form of art--needs so desperately to be included in a fanworks archive. I am willing to stretch and say I consider it a non-fictional creative work--because well, it is--but couldn't it have it's own non-fictional creative work archive? A meta archive, you might say. Separate from the fic. Which in general, the archive was created to house? Just a thought.
Because in general, when I am in a reading fic mood, I am not technically interested in meta, and when sorting through a few hundred thousand fics to try to find non-crossover fandom of my choice with my pairing or pairings--which already requires me to start considering a blood sacrifice to shorten the process of horror--I now will have to watch for snowflake's feelings on a pairing not being labeled as meta.
Spoken as someone who is really not okay with the nightmare of having to figure out how run exclusion strings with not only crossovers, but every single pairing I don't like and now meta may need to be added, assuming the writer bothers to label it. That doesn't always work.
References
AO3 Announces Meta Allowed in Archive - link to AO3's announcement page
In case anyone wonders if the addition of meta has a plan on how it will be handled:
Just as art, podfic and video can currently be found on the AO3, so can meta. The difference, of course, is that the AO3's current infrastructure already supports the direct hosting of meta in text form, so its continuation on the archive has been more a question of policy than ability. This does not mean that there won't be technical issues involved, particularly when it comes to users' desire to filter their search results to find or exclude it. We don't currently have a time estimate from our AD&T committee (which runs the AO3) on how quickly a solution can be created to address that. -- Admin-claudia in comments, AO3
ETA:
Free Food Restaurant - AO3 meta. Okay, it's hilarious, stupid, and lists two fandoms without any meta tags whatsoever. And also, again, hilarious. Free food, y'all. Fic is like free food, but not in a clever way like hummus. (THANKS
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:If you mean the Transformative Works and Culture journal's "Symposium" section, also no, I don't consider that remotely the same thing as a fannish space to put fannish meta. I know that the journal editors want fans to submit things, but honestly, I for one would never want to, or even dare; I don't have an academic bent at *all*, and the thought of working and reworking a fannish essay to be appropriate to an academic journal is... no. I can't do it, and I won't tie myself in knots trying. And I don't think most fans seek out that journal as a place to find fannish meta, anyway; I think that audience naturally skews very hard toward academics.
There's no central place in fandom right now to put meta. There's no way to find it, unless you already know the person writing it or happen to get linked to it by someone. The new "metanews" comm is trying, but it's only been around for a few weeks, and afaict is being run by one person, who's pretty much bound to burn out at some point.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- expand
- link
)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
From:There's no excuse for opening up to vids and podfic and meta without first implementing an easy way to select what type of work you're looking for (edit: and a required way to specify what type of work you are posting). It makes no sense. Any system that they bolt on later will necessary be uglier, work less well, and require more work than building in this ability from the start. And they can't possibly have failed to know that people wanted that feature.
I'm at the point where I'll continue to post on AO3, but I'm backing up my fic against the day when people abandon it as unusable. Not saying it'll be tomorrow, but if they continue down this road, it'll happen.
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:It honestly seems to me that a "select by type of media" function and required categorization of a work into an existing type at the time of upload should be basic functionality. Shouldn't it?
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- expand
- link
)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Huh
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
From:http://archiveofourown.org/works/689630
<3
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- expand
- link
)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:In comments in my LJ,
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Then again, all of the non-standard tags must make maintaining that archive a pain. I mean, I get that tumblr fans are used to communicating through tags rather than the body of the messages but those of us who remember older archives (like, say, SSA) would like tags that are consistently useful and make it easier to find fic.
...mind you, I don't hit crossovers too often. Maybe because I'm used to filtering by pairing rather than fandom, and pairings within one show rarely feature as crossover fodder. (As opposed to pairings across canons.)
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(That said, I agree, but the complexity is detail level; creating a system so you can filter for your story being a single fandom shouldn't be that hard.)
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- expand
- link
)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- expand
- link
)
no subject
From:AMEN AMEN AMEN
Tumblr's a different platform. Tumblr tags are appropriate for Tumblr, not for AO3. It's like the people who use hash tags on Facebook. Argh.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
(no subject)
From:no subject
From:FicTitle1 □art □fic □meta □vid ○●crossover?(radio button Y/N)
FicTitle2 □art □fic □meta □vid ○●crossover?(radio button Y/N)
ArtTitle1 □art □fic □meta □vid ○●crossover?(radio button Y/N) and so on...
and checking all the boxes on that one, centralized page would edit the metadata on all the works. Because if all uses have to go to every single entry to one by one edit meta-data, it won't get done. I already have no idea what I have uploaded, and I think I just have about 200 works up.
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I do agree that there should be a more robust system to mark what kind of work something is, though. On the other hand, I can't see any way to do that that doesn't leave it up to the individual, which kind of puts us right back where we started.
I feel like there's more to be said about this but I really have to go to class, so.
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I do agree that there should be a more robust system to mark what kind of work something is, though. On the other hand, I can't see any way to do that that doesn't leave it up to the individual, which kind of puts us right back where we started.
Having a mandatory field for type of fanwork would do the trick.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)