Tuesday, February 5th, 2013 10:09 pm
richard iii is found!
Also, forgot to put this in last entry:
Richard III found under parking lot.
I'll be completely honest; I had tears in my eyes reading that he's been found. Richard III is my number one historical crush, with Caesar and Elizabeth I taking second and third (I have like, forty of these, but they're mostly unnumbered, but these three are the loves of my life, okay?).
For all your woobie Richard III professional novel needs:
The Sunne in Splendour by Sharon Kay Penman - this is one of my buy-in-all-formats books. I have bought it twice in paperback and once in ebook for my Kindle. This is the epic story of Richard III, who is the bestest brother, husband, and father ever, and everyone who hates him is just like, stupid, okay? Stupid.
I have many varied feelings on Richard. All of them are about how everyone else sucks.
Dear Henry Tudor (and Stanley, you fucker),
Suck it.
love,
seperis
Richard III found under parking lot.
I'll be completely honest; I had tears in my eyes reading that he's been found. Richard III is my number one historical crush, with Caesar and Elizabeth I taking second and third (I have like, forty of these, but they're mostly unnumbered, but these three are the loves of my life, okay?).
For all your woobie Richard III professional novel needs:
The Sunne in Splendour by Sharon Kay Penman - this is one of my buy-in-all-formats books. I have bought it twice in paperback and once in ebook for my Kindle. This is the epic story of Richard III, who is the bestest brother, husband, and father ever, and everyone who hates him is just like, stupid, okay? Stupid.
I have many varied feelings on Richard. All of them are about how everyone else sucks.
Dear Henry Tudor (and Stanley, you fucker),
Suck it.
love,
seperis
no subject
From:Tey's novel is definitely well written, but as a historian of the time period I found it incredibly insulting. I appreciate that her characters do research, but they way Grant so quickly and easily discards sources and evidence that don't fit his hypothesis is the exact opposite of what a trained historian should do. That Grant's entire hypothesis is based around what he thinks Richard III could or could not do based on his portrait is mind boggling.
I am endlessly sorry about this!! I have been biting my tongue for DAYS and I just... couldn't anymore. Please forgive me- I disagree as respectfully as I possibly can.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)