Monday, March 2nd, 2009 12:02 pm
psa: Racefail: Once More, With Misdirection by Coffeeandink
RaceFail: Once More, with Misdirection by
coffeeandink. Read. Every. Word.
In a twist I'm sure Kathryn Cramer finds righteous and deeply clever--maybe she'll talk about putting on airs next?--
coffeeandink's RL name was outed in that woman's blog. I'm going to quote
cofax7's reaction, since she says it best.
I think that encapsulates it nicely. Read
coffeeandink's complete entry on what's happened so far, because at this point, God knows what is going to happen next.
In a twist I'm sure Kathryn Cramer finds righteous and deeply clever--maybe she'll talk about putting on airs next?--
More RaceFail: This is what happens when you stick up for your principles. The fundamental law in online discourse, particularly in fandom, is that you do not out people. But Will Shetterly (whose writing I used to enjoy) and Kathryn Cramer (who has written meaningfully in the pursuit of government accountability) think it's more important to cast blame, to assert grudgewank, than to analyze arguments. I don't care what you think about RaceFail 09, or if you're tired of it or whatever. But this is the establishment striking back at the online community, this is the frenzy of disparagement by people tied to a failing model. And this is why pseudonymity is So Fucking Important.
Fuck you, Will Shetterly. And fuck you, too, Kathryn Cramer. I will not link to you. -- link
I think that encapsulates it nicely. Read
no subject
From:God knows what is going to happen next.
Word. The arguments Cramer in particular is using are so void of understanding of the context of this discussion. It's nice however to see that a pro-SF fandom fixture like
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(Pingbacks work? Sweet!)
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Do I need to do anything else but go to privacy and set for all in that drop down box?
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Both.
And no, just go to the privacy settings and pick how you want it.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:No, it's still dishonest. Because any honest analysis would have to acknowledge that Micole has been commenting on issues of race and privilege for several years, and was involved in the controversy long before either of the NHs stuck their foot in it. Nobody had ANY reason to expect the NHs to get involved, and that they did, and that finally Micole called them on it, was entirely their fault.
I defy anyone to find Micole commenting publicly on the behavior of either of the NHs at any time before this. If this is grudgewank, it doesn't work like any grudgewank I've ever seen.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Okay, I will stop trying to see ways in which it is not an up-front douche move.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I can't imagine WHY Cramer would go to such lengths to protect her husband's employers.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Oh ho ho. Suddenly things become much more clear. Possibly even more unsavory, but much clearer.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Not with the resolution of rosefox, though.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:No, wait, I misspoke. She dared to criticize Shetterly's wife and Shetterly and Cramer's friends the NHs. And others with whom they associate on both professional and personal bases.
I suspect more damage has been done in defending others in this whole imbroglio than in defending one's self.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:This is truly detestable behavior.
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
WTF!
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:"How low can you go?"
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:And there's a reason I've always maintained that while fandom may be home to me, I'll never fucking live there. This kind of shit? This is part of it. This is a huge part of it.
It's going to be very, very difficult not to punch any of these people in the face the next WorldCon I'm at. I'm not even a violent person and it's going to very fucking difficult. I'll probably simply do what I always do when I have nothing civil to say and the urge to commit violence: I will shun. But even that'll be fucking hard to stick to.
(Frankly, I'm stunned that this is still ongoing -- and that it is somehow managing to sink to even lower levels yet. What the fucking hell. Congratulations, folks, you're managing to stun people who are already cynical about your behaviour at this point. That's... quite the achievement there!)
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
Shetterly & Cramer: Once More, With Failing
From:(- reply to this
- link
)