Sunday, February 1st, 2009 02:53 pm
in relation to tor
There's been some discussion of a boycott of Tor--I mean, I am not seeing an anti-Tor community popping up or anything, but before that happens, I'm going to quote
chopchica on the subject:
This isn't to suggest anyone--anyone, most especially those most hurt by
tnh's actions during this--shouldn't follow their conscience and if they are uncomfortable buying from Tor, I respect and support their decision completely and without reserve.
Having said that, I think
chopchica hit the nail on the head in what this means. I'm not sure a boycott will have any effect on
tnh or her husband, but it could badly damage other writers. As someone with several published writers on their flist (I have no idea what company they use, come to think, but they could be affected, so take this with the knowledge I have a Schrodinger's dog who may or may not be fighting), I'm aware, as far as their entries on the subject have indicated, how difficult it is to make a comfortable living doing it. For that matter, I think most of us can name one or two published or pre-published writers we know and talk to.
I cannot and will not presume to tell anyone, for any reason, what they should do or how they should feel (and if I do, hi, if my pants are down? I will fix that shit first, ask questions later), but I do want to emphasize that the authors affected will be invisible collateral damage. We won't know who they are, or how they will be affected, or if a new writer, maybe one of our friends, a member of our community, our fandom, our flist, was rejected in relation to a formal boycott.
So--yes. I only rewrote that four times in an hour.
The thing is, phn and tnh, while both *huge assholes* =/= Tor, just as some really asshatted authors =/= Tor. There are a lot of authors - and future authors - who will be the ones penalized if there's a boycott or backlass. It's a real conundrum for me. I personally don't ever want them to see a dime of my money. However, I don't want to punish others for their bad behavior.
I'm a bit worried that this post is going to rally up some kind of larger boycott, or be seen as a call for one, so I'm going to run around and paste this response here and there, just to make it clear I am *not* suggesting everybody boycott Tor. I think a much better response would be to send letters of crit to the top of the houses, to try to make it clear that the actions of pnh and especially tnh are very seriously hurting their future business - as well as possibly frightening a lot of future authors into never subbing to them. - link
This isn't to suggest anyone--anyone, most especially those most hurt by
Having said that, I think
I cannot and will not presume to tell anyone, for any reason, what they should do or how they should feel (and if I do, hi, if my pants are down? I will fix that shit first, ask questions later), but I do want to emphasize that the authors affected will be invisible collateral damage. We won't know who they are, or how they will be affected, or if a new writer, maybe one of our friends, a member of our community, our fandom, our flist, was rejected in relation to a formal boycott.
So--yes. I only rewrote that four times in an hour.
no subject
From:That said, I'll be staying far away from ML from now on, and there are certain particular writers who will not be getting any of my royalties from now on.
But I really do need to buy Toby Buckell's stuff.
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I went there out of curiosity to see if any of this was mentioned there. It wasn't.
What *was* mentioned was a review of a book called "Principles of the American Cargo Cult".
Quoting PNH: The outlined principles divide up alarmingly well into “stuff I recognize as generally true about the way Americans think” and “stuff I just now realized I think.” Damn.
One of them:
Good intentions suffice
You can always apologize.
Um, or apparently not apologize. Instead you can just run away.
Edited to fix html.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Thanks...
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(At this point, my divisions are breaking down into sensible and batshit. Possibly I need a finer-grain seive.)
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I'm actually at a point where there are a few people I'm eyeing sideways, expecting outbreaks of batshit at any moment.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I swear, English needs better 3rd-person plural structures.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Can I send you to her post? Post is here. (http://chopchica.livejournal.com/163464.html) The very, very short version is, there was a discussion in
That's a completely bare bones rendering of it and I think is way too simplistic to encompass this; I think
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Very helpful timeline.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:But I think you are generally correct. While Tor may eventually drop her due to bad publicity (though, in a way, I hope they don't since they'll just play into her paranoia, and I'd always rather people "See the light" rather than suffer damage), it is not like the publisher is endorsing her livejournal.
I do, however, understand that people can no longer buy her material in good conscience. I won't even read Orson Scott Card's work because of some political statements he's made, particularly regarding sexuality.
I do sometimes wonder if in the final analysis, discussions of author's political and other beliefs will just generally lead to publishers strongly suggesting that their authors not communicate with the public outside of official channels. It seems like it rarely does them good, and often does them harm. But it's not like the public can possibly ignore those statements once they're made.
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I'm certainly not going to read ML any longer, or buy the books of the authors who participated in this thing, but I don't want to participate in a boycott or Tor -- because, as you said, it would also target people who weren't involved in this.
Unfortunately I don't think the boycott is going to be big enough or loud enough to be heard of anywhere but a small part of the online community.
The entire thing is a damn shame. They were people whose opinions I respected and whose works, fiction and meta, I enjoyed reading. To see them behave like this is disheartening.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:What a sad, horrible mess.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:Letters could also be directed to the sponsors of BoingBoing and Making Light.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:What/where is this "post" that started this WHOLE brouhaha?
Why do people keep talking about not having any pants on? Are they at least sitting on towels?
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:http://seeking-avalon.blogspot.com/2009/01/timeline.html
That is a good timeline to get an idea of what started this and what it's turned into.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:*points up* a lot of people have done good links round-ups.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I don't even know these authors or their books.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:http://spiralsheep.livejournal.com/276691.html
http://coffeeandink.livejournal.com/888012.html
tnh came weeks later. bear lead to sarah monette/truepenny which led to medievalist and mac_stone. they led to pnh (husband of tnh) who deleted not only his post but his entire lj. By the time tnh showed up, this had been going on for *weeks* - at which point she decided to ignore all previous evidence and history and go after people for being mean to her husband.
Emma Bull, Will Shetterly, Sarah Monette and Elizabeth Bear are SF/F authors. Patrick Neilsen Hayden runs the SF/F department at Tor books and is an editor. Theresa Neilsen Hayden used to edit for Tor and now consults and moderates Making Light and Boing Boing. mac_stone runs a very popular forum for beginning writers. medievalist is just an asshole - albeit a very educated one!
The thing is, it's been going on for so long now. It's very hard to catch up (and the whole hiding the evidence game makes it worse). What this started with was a discussion about cultural appropriation. What it turned into was a forum for defensive white people to say racist things while hiding behind a shield of academia and POC being uneducated raving hoardes. Then it turned into a whole lot of the pain white people were dealing with from all of this happening. And *now* it appears to be about tnh - a one-woman force for justice - threatening everybody who hurt her husband's feelings and refusing to accept that discussions of racism happen outside of her journal.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:mac_stone is also the person who set off the worst of it - by making a post where she outlined all of the qualities of an abuser, and then stated that every single POC who had challenged her about her views fit those criteria. This led to lots of outrage, medievalist topping her recent level of fail with even *more* fail, and pnh wading into the fray to defend his good friend mac_stone (which he did by saying that some people were just smarter than others).
mac_stone was the first person to make a brand new, deliberately inflammatory post just to stir things up. She was also the first to delete and is still around yapping about how people are saying things she didn't say. She's ignoring the part where they have *screencaps*.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:And hopefully that poor girl will start hanging out with a classier, less exploitative set of friends. As a PoC friend of mine remarked, "It's like reading my own internalised racism from five years ago. But I got over it, and so can she!" All hope is not lost, but I fear she'll have a painful awakening.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)