There's been some discussion of a boycott of Tor--I mean, I am not seeing an anti-Tor community popping up or anything, but before that happens, I'm going to quote [livejournal.com profile] chopchica on the subject:

The thing is, phn and tnh, while both *huge assholes* =/= Tor, just as some really asshatted authors =/= Tor. There are a lot of authors - and future authors - who will be the ones penalized if there's a boycott or backlass. It's a real conundrum for me. I personally don't ever want them to see a dime of my money. However, I don't want to punish others for their bad behavior.

I'm a bit worried that this post is going to rally up some kind of larger boycott, or be seen as a call for one, so I'm going to run around and paste this response here and there, just to make it clear I am *not* suggesting everybody boycott Tor. I think a much better response would be to send letters of crit to the top of the houses, to try to make it clear that the actions of pnh and especially tnh are very seriously hurting their future business - as well as possibly frightening a lot of future authors into never subbing to them.
- link


This isn't to suggest anyone--anyone, most especially those most hurt by [livejournal.com profile] tnh's actions during this--shouldn't follow their conscience and if they are uncomfortable buying from Tor, I respect and support their decision completely and without reserve.

Having said that, I think [livejournal.com profile] chopchica hit the nail on the head in what this means. I'm not sure a boycott will have any effect on [livejournal.com profile] tnh or her husband, but it could badly damage other writers. As someone with several published writers on their flist (I have no idea what company they use, come to think, but they could be affected, so take this with the knowledge I have a Schrodinger's dog who may or may not be fighting), I'm aware, as far as their entries on the subject have indicated, how difficult it is to make a comfortable living doing it. For that matter, I think most of us can name one or two published or pre-published writers we know and talk to.

I cannot and will not presume to tell anyone, for any reason, what they should do or how they should feel (and if I do, hi, if my pants are down? I will fix that shit first, ask questions later), but I do want to emphasize that the authors affected will be invisible collateral damage. We won't know who they are, or how they will be affected, or if a new writer, maybe one of our friends, a member of our community, our fandom, our flist, was rejected in relation to a formal boycott.

So--yes. I only rewrote that four times in an hour.
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)

From: [personal profile] cofax7 Date: 2009-02-01 09:18 pm (UTC)
I think Chopchica and your point is well-made.

That said, I'll be staying far away from ML from now on, and there are certain particular writers who will not be getting any of my royalties from now on.

But I really do need to buy Toby Buckell's stuff.

From: [identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 09:23 pm (UTC)
I think I'm going author-specific on this one, too. And yeah, ML is off my reading list. I don't think I can read it again and not remember what was said in [livejournal.com profile] tnh's LJ.
reginagiraffe: Stick figure of me with long wavy hair and giraffe on shirt. (Default)

From: [personal profile] reginagiraffe Date: 2009-02-01 10:01 pm (UTC)
*facepalm*

I went there out of curiosity to see if any of this was mentioned there. It wasn't.

What *was* mentioned was a review of a book called "Principles of the American Cargo Cult".

Quoting PNH: The outlined principles divide up alarmingly well into “stuff I recognize as generally true about the way Americans think” and “stuff I just now realized I think.” Damn.

One of them:

Good intentions suffice

You can always apologize.



Um, or apparently not apologize. Instead you can just run away.

Edited to fix html.
edited at: Date: 2009-02-01 10:01 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 10:14 pm (UTC)
...I guess that wasn't supposed to be deliberate irony. *blank* I--can we pretend it was?

From: [identity profile] joannindiw.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 11:27 pm (UTC)
er. May I ask who ML is? ^^V I'm following the links out of morbidity but... I must have missed that?

Thanks...

From: [identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 11:36 pm (UTC)
ML is Making Light tnh's blog/discussion board she moderates. Sorry about the confusion! I forgot to clarify my acronyms.

From: [identity profile] joannindiw.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 12:09 am (UTC)
ah! Thank you. I thought it might be an author. ^^

From: [identity profile] wrenlet.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 10:22 pm (UTC)
*perk* Is Toby involved in NON-asshaberdashery, or was that a general sentiment?
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)

From: [personal profile] cofax7 Date: 2009-02-01 10:23 pm (UTC)
I haven't seen him comment on the race!fail, although I don't know that he hasn't. He is also a writer of color, though, and he's gotten good reviews. Seems like a sensible guy.

(At this point, my divisions are breaking down into sensible and batshit. Possibly I need a finer-grain seive.)

From: [identity profile] wrenlet.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 10:26 pm (UTC)
*nod* I hadn't seen him around and was wondering.

I'm actually at a point where there are a few people I'm eyeing sideways, expecting outbreaks of batshit at any moment.

From: [identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 10:44 pm (UTC)
Oh good, I'm not the only one blinking slowly around with a faint feeling of paranoia.

From: [identity profile] chopchica.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 11:33 pm (UTC)
I'm totally gonna be watching you tonight!

From: [identity profile] ktempest.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 02:59 pm (UTC)
Toby has commented sensibly on other racefail. He doesn't hang out on LJ, so he may not have been aware of this one until much later.

From: [identity profile] rachelmanija.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 11:37 pm (UTC)
He's commented sensibly in the past. I would generally consider him to be an anti-asshaberdasher.

From: [identity profile] wrenlet.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 03:16 am (UTC)
That's relieving. Lord knows the DEFEND MY SOCIAL CIRCLE AGAINST ALL COMERS trap has snared several people I thought had better heads on their shoulders than this.

From: [identity profile] chopchica.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 11:20 pm (UTC)
I am *totally* well made! \o/
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)

From: [personal profile] cofax7 Date: 2009-02-01 11:26 pm (UTC)
::facepalms::

I swear, English needs better 3rd-person plural structures.

From: [identity profile] jonquil.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 06:04 pm (UTC)
What you said, and what seperis said.

From: [identity profile] piplover.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 10:28 pm (UTC)
Ummm...could you please explain what this all about? I tried to read up on the backstory, but so far, all I'm getting is that someone did something mean and someone else did something mean back. What's going on?

From: [identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 10:43 pm (UTC)
God, I'm probably the worst to do this since I wasn't even reading my flist when the cultural appropriation debates started. [livejournal.com profile] chopchica's post has a pretty good summary of the latest part of it.

Can I send you to her post? Post is here. (http://chopchica.livejournal.com/163464.html) The very, very short version is, there was a discussion in [livejournal.com profile] tnh's husband's post (now deleted) that called him on some of his assumptions regarding the aforementioned cultural appropriation debates and that some of it had racist connotations (I havent' seen this post; he deleted it when he deleted his lj). She defended her husband in a now-locked post that quickly went badly and accused everyone who didn't agree with her of being sockpuppets. Then there was the second post that is visible now.

That's a completely bare bones rendering of it and I think is way too simplistic to encompass this; I think [livejournal.com profile] chopchica's post will at least cover the latest part. I'd also really encourage reading through [livejournal.com profile] rydra_wong's links here (http://rydra-wong.livejournal.com/?style=mine). It's a *lot* of reading, but it's excellent stuff and I recommend reading through it all if you can.

From: [identity profile] chopchica.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 11:33 pm (UTC)
http://seeking-avalon.blogspot.com/2009/01/timeline.html

Very helpful timeline.

From: [identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 11:35 pm (UTC)
*facepalm* And I had marked that for further reading I think last night. Gah. Thank you.
ext_3058: (Default)

From: [identity profile] deadlychameleon.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 11:11 pm (UTC)
Yuck, I keep coming late the discussion, and by the time I get there - the original source of the problem is deleted. But I have to say that I'm not wild about the secondary reactions. Just.. complete inability to accept that she might have said something wrong. Complete. No, clearly this is because people don't like her or something. Like that even makes sense.

But I think you are generally correct. While Tor may eventually drop her due to bad publicity (though, in a way, I hope they don't since they'll just play into her paranoia, and I'd always rather people "See the light" rather than suffer damage), it is not like the publisher is endorsing her livejournal.

I do, however, understand that people can no longer buy her material in good conscience. I won't even read Orson Scott Card's work because of some political statements he's made, particularly regarding sexuality.

I do sometimes wonder if in the final analysis, discussions of author's political and other beliefs will just generally lead to publishers strongly suggesting that their authors not communicate with the public outside of official channels. It seems like it rarely does them good, and often does them harm. But it's not like the public can possibly ignore those statements once they're made.
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)

From: [personal profile] cofax7 Date: 2009-02-01 11:27 pm (UTC)
Well, to make it more complicated, TNH is an editor at Tor, not a writer. So people not wanting to support her end up penalizing writers who may or may not agree with her opinions.
ext_3058: (Default)

From: [identity profile] deadlychameleon.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 03:50 am (UTC)
Ah, ok. Again with the coming in late to the game...

From: [identity profile] cjk1701.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-01 11:28 pm (UTC)
It's sad how much BNFs (fandom or publishing) are allowed (or think they're allowed) to get away with just because of their [perceived] status.

I'm certainly not going to read ML any longer, or buy the books of the authors who participated in this thing, but I don't want to participate in a boycott or Tor -- because, as you said, it would also target people who weren't involved in this.

Unfortunately I don't think the boycott is going to be big enough or loud enough to be heard of anywhere but a small part of the online community.

The entire thing is a damn shame. They were people whose opinions I respected and whose works, fiction and meta, I enjoyed reading. To see them behave like this is disheartening.

From: [identity profile] mirabile-dictu.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 12:08 am (UTC)
I was just talking to my husband about this, and how sad I am that writers I really liked have turned out to be such assholes, and that I'll never read them again. Why are the words "I'm sorry" so incredibly difficult for some people to say? And then to walk away from the keyboard.

What a sad, horrible mess.

From: [identity profile] rachelmanija.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 12:29 am (UTC)
I think writing a letter of complaint would be better than a boycott. Holtzbrinck USA owns Tor (for various reasons, I think writing directly to Tor would not be worthwhile), and letters could be directed to their HR Department.

Letters could also be directed to the sponsors of BoingBoing and Making Light.

From: [identity profile] cottontail.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 12:48 am (UTC)
Okay, two questions.

What/where is this "post" that started this WHOLE brouhaha?

Why do people keep talking about not having any pants on? Are they at least sitting on towels?

From: [identity profile] chopchica.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 01:29 am (UTC)
It's an expression meaning you are acting like an ass (and therefore showing your ass) in public and that theoretically instead of showing your ass, you might prefer to have it pointed out so you can fix the situation (ie put on some pants).

http://seeking-avalon.blogspot.com/2009/01/timeline.html

That is a good timeline to get an idea of what started this and what it's turned into. [livejournal.com profile] rydra_wong has an extensive set of links as well.
ariadne83: cropped from official schematics (Default)

From: [personal profile] ariadne83 Date: 2009-02-02 01:38 am (UTC)
How far back do you want to go? IIRC, it all started with Elisabeth Bear posting about how easy it is to write the Other. Fen of colour disagreed, citing problems with Bear's work, and she apologised & backed down BUT Bear's friends leaped in to defend her, in her LJ and on their own. Nasty language was used, and Bear didn't call her friends on it so it escalated.

*points up* a lot of people have done good links round-ups.

From: [identity profile] cottontail.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 01:41 am (UTC)
Thanks. I'm trying to catch up now. Just finished reading the original Bear post.

From: [identity profile] chopchica.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 01:54 am (UTC)
Remember, a lot of the uglier stuff that happened and that was said was deleted and hidden. medievalist also went back into most of the posts out there and deleted all of her comments. [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink has caps of some of the missing posts.

From: [identity profile] cottontail.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 01:58 am (UTC)
Yeah, that's what's making it hard to catch up. I was wanting to read the original TNH post because I thought that is what started the whole thing. Now I see it was the Bear post and TNH came later on but is now deleted.

I don't even know these authors or their books.

From: [identity profile] chopchica.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 02:10 am (UTC)
http://spiralsheep.livejournal.com/276263.html

http://spiralsheep.livejournal.com/276691.html

http://coffeeandink.livejournal.com/888012.html


tnh came weeks later. bear lead to sarah monette/truepenny which led to medievalist and mac_stone. they led to pnh (husband of tnh) who deleted not only his post but his entire lj. By the time tnh showed up, this had been going on for *weeks* - at which point she decided to ignore all previous evidence and history and go after people for being mean to her husband.

Emma Bull, Will Shetterly, Sarah Monette and Elizabeth Bear are SF/F authors. Patrick Neilsen Hayden runs the SF/F department at Tor books and is an editor. Theresa Neilsen Hayden used to edit for Tor and now consults and moderates Making Light and Boing Boing. mac_stone runs a very popular forum for beginning writers. medievalist is just an asshole - albeit a very educated one!

The thing is, it's been going on for so long now. It's very hard to catch up (and the whole hiding the evidence game makes it worse). What this started with was a discussion about cultural appropriation. What it turned into was a forum for defensive white people to say racist things while hiding behind a shield of academia and POC being uneducated raving hoardes. Then it turned into a whole lot of the pain white people were dealing with from all of this happening. And *now* it appears to be about tnh - a one-woman force for justice - threatening everybody who hurt her husband's feelings and refusing to accept that discussions of racism happen outside of her journal.

From: [identity profile] ichorinmyveins.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 02:51 am (UTC)
I understand. But what does Tor mean? I bought ebooks, but I can't think of any online stores that have this initial.

From: [identity profile] wrenlet.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 03:13 am (UTC)
Tor is a publishing house.

From: [identity profile] lurkerlynne.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 05:47 am (UTC)
As a latecomer (found out about this yesterday), that's the best description of this imbroglio I've come across yet. ::thumbs up::

From: [identity profile] jonquil.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 06:08 pm (UTC)
I didn't realize about [livejournal.com profile] mac_stone. I thought he was just a jerk -- I hadn't realized he was part of the SFF granfalloon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granfalloon).

From: [identity profile] chopchica.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 07:19 pm (UTC)
mac_stone is a woman, actually! She also runs the absolute write forum - a place for beginning writers to begin to feel at home in the writing world so they can try to go pro. How's THAT for irony!

mac_stone is also the person who set off the worst of it - by making a post where she outlined all of the qualities of an abuser, and then stated that every single POC who had challenged her about her views fit those criteria. This led to lots of outrage, medievalist topping her recent level of fail with even *more* fail, and pnh wading into the fray to defend his good friend mac_stone (which he did by saying that some people were just smarter than others).

mac_stone was the first person to make a brand new, deliberately inflammatory post just to stir things up. She was also the first to delete and is still around yapping about how people are saying things she didn't say. She's ignoring the part where they have *screencaps*.

From: [identity profile] raincitygirl.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-03 01:39 am (UTC)
She also dumped the whole <lj user=diversity2009 mess on an unqualified TEENAGER (who entirely admits she's unqualified) on the grounds that the teen in question was one of the few PoC on the internet still speaking to her. Said teen also has issues with her race that can be seen from SPACE (to the point where she started denying she was a PoC at all), so I'm guessing mac_stone saw her as an excellent patsy. Yes, the girl in question has been acting like an idiot, but she's a KID, for fuck's sake. Everybody's an idiot then. And medievalist and mac_stone are a couple of grown-ass women using a PoC girl as a metaphorical human shield.

From: [identity profile] chopchica.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-03 03:50 am (UTC)
Yep, way to fail, mac_stone and medievalist! It was so painful to watch that happen and I feel so bad for that poor girl right now.

From: [identity profile] raincitygirl.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-04 02:27 am (UTC)
It was the buttercream icing on top of the fail-cake.

And hopefully that poor girl will start hanging out with a classier, less exploitative set of friends. As a PoC friend of mine remarked, "It's like reading my own internalised racism from five years ago. But I got over it, and so can she!" All hope is not lost, but I fear she'll have a painful awakening.
ariadne83: cropped from official schematics (Default)

From: [personal profile] ariadne83 Date: 2009-02-02 01:56 am (UTC)
*points up* What [livejournal.com profile] chopchica said. These are supposed to be professional authors and editors, but they can't take criticism and lash out at people.

From: [identity profile] tavella.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 08:06 am (UTC)
Unfortunately, it's hard to really get full context, as a number of people in the ebear/tnh axis have deleted their posts (and the tracks of their bad behavior with it. )

From: [identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com Date: 2009-02-02 03:01 pm (UTC)
That's one of the problems I had when I came out of a Merlin-fic-induced fancoma and saw my flist was talking about stuff that had already been deleted.

Profile

seperis: (Default)
seperis

Tags

Quotes

  • If you don't send me feedback, I will sob uncontrollably for hours on end, until finally, in a fit of depression, I slash my wrists and bleed out on the bathroom floor. My death will be on your heads. Murderers
    . -- Unknown, on feedback
    BTS List
  • That's why he goes bad, you know -- all the good people hit him on the head or try to shoot him and constantly mistrust him, while there's this vast cohort of minions saying, We wouldn't hurt you, Lex, and we'll give you power and greatness and oh so much sex...
    Wow. That was scary. Lex is like Jesus in the desert.
    -- pricklyelf, on why Lex goes bad
    LJ
  • Obi-Wan has a sort of desperate, pathetic patience in this movie. You can just see it in his eyes: "My padawan is a psychopath, and no one will believe me; I'm barely keeping him under control and expect to wake up any night now to find him standing over my bed with a knife!"
    -- Teague, reviewing "Star Wars: Attack of the Clones"
    LJ
  • Beth: god, why do i have so many beads?
    Jenn: Because you are an addict.
    Jenn: There are twelve step programs for this.
    Beth: i dunno they'd work, might have to go straight for the electroshock.
    Jenn: I'm not sure that helps with bead addiction.
    Beth: i was thinking more to demagnitize my credit card.
    -- hwmitzy and seperis, on bead addiction
    AIM, 12/24/2003
  • I could rape a goat and it will DIE PRETTIER than they write.
    -- anonymous, on terrible writing
    AIM, 2/17/2004
  • In medical billing there is a diagnosis code for someone who commits suicide by sea anenemoe.
    -- silverkyst, on wtf
    AIM, 3/25/2004
  • Anonymous: sorry. i just wanted to tell you how much i liked you. i'd like to take this to a higher level if you're willing
    Eleveninches: By higher level I hope you mean email.
    -- eleveninches and anonymous, on things that are disturbing
    LJ, 4/2/2004
  • silverkyst: I need to not be taking molecular genetics.
    silverkyst: though, as a sidenote, I did learn how to eviscerate a fruit fly larvae by pulling it's mouth out by it's mouthparts today.
    silverkyst: I'm just nowhere near competent in the subject material to be taking it.
    Jenn: I'd like to thank you for that image.
    -- silverkyst and seperis, on more wtf
    AIM, 1/25/2005
  • You know, if obi-wan had just disciplined the boy *properly* we wouldn't be having these problems. Can't you just see yoda? "Take him in hand, you must. The true Force, you must show him."
    -- Issaro, on spanking Anakin in his formative years
    LJ, 3/15/2005
  • Aside from the fact that one person should never go near another with a penis, a bottle of body wash, and a hopeful expression...
    -- Summerfling, on shower sex
    LJ, 7/22/2005
  • It's weird, after you get used to the affection you get from a rabbit, it's like any other BDSM relationship. Only without the sex and hot chicks in leather corsets wielding floggers. You'll grow to like it.
    -- revelininsanity, on my relationship with my rabbit
    LJ, 2/7/2006
  • Smudged upon the near horizon, lapine shadows in the mist. Like a doomsday vision from Watership Down, the bunny intervention approaches.
    -- cpt_untouchable, on my addition of The Fourth Bunny
    LJ, 4/13/2006
  • Rule 3. Chemistry is kind of like bondage. Some people like it, some people like reading about or watching other people doing it, and a large number of people's reaction to actually doing the serious stuff is to recoil in horror.
    -- deadlychameleon, on class
    LJ, 9/1/2007
  • If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then Fan Fiction is John Cusack standing outside your house with a boombox.
    -- JRDSkinner, on fanfiction
    Twitter
  • I will unashamedly and unapologetically celebrate the joy and the warmth and the creativity of a community of people sharing something positive and beautiful and connective and if you don’t like it you are most welcome to very fuck off.
    -- Michael Sheen, on Good Omens fanfic
    Twitter
    , 6/19/2019
  • Adding for Mastodon.
    -- Jenn, traceback
    Fosstodon
    , 11/6/2022

Credit

November 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 2022
Page generated Feb. 24th, 2026 12:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios