Saturday, May 17th, 2008 09:27 pm
saturdays are boring
Most Hated Books in
glitterandlube's livejournal. I'm feeling a strong sense of solidarity atm, because dear God am I tired about being told about meaningful books and blah blah blah.
Here's why: in the greater scheme of things, it's rare that in fiction, meaningful trumps entertaining for me personally. I don't often go out, stare at the fiction section, and think to myself, I need a course of philosophical thought. Let me find something fictional to act allegorically on this. No. I'll get out my fucking Plato like a normal person. It's also why I love CS Lewis up to the last book (and I like the last book, just I hate Narnia ending, and he took off the kid gloves too hard and too fast near the end).
(I also love the fact freaking Bacchus is in there. You cannot hate anyone who has the god of wine and sex showing up at Creation. That's kickass. The after party of Narnia Creation must have been for the record books, people. Bacchus. Oh Lewis. Sometimes.)
(I'm also still confused by the misogynist argument about Susan in that one. I don't argue that women in Lewis' books weren't exactly treated with the care of the men, but even when I was twelve, I read Susan's defection as worldliness and narcissism and materialism, not sexuality.)
ETA: Link fixed. *sighs* That's what I get for having a thousand tabs open of SPN spoilers.
Here's why: in the greater scheme of things, it's rare that in fiction, meaningful trumps entertaining for me personally. I don't often go out, stare at the fiction section, and think to myself, I need a course of philosophical thought. Let me find something fictional to act allegorically on this. No. I'll get out my fucking Plato like a normal person. It's also why I love CS Lewis up to the last book (and I like the last book, just I hate Narnia ending, and he took off the kid gloves too hard and too fast near the end).
(I also love the fact freaking Bacchus is in there. You cannot hate anyone who has the god of wine and sex showing up at Creation. That's kickass. The after party of Narnia Creation must have been for the record books, people. Bacchus. Oh Lewis. Sometimes.)
(I'm also still confused by the misogynist argument about Susan in that one. I don't argue that women in Lewis' books weren't exactly treated with the care of the men, but even when I was twelve, I read Susan's defection as worldliness and narcissism and materialism, not sexuality.)
ETA: Link fixed. *sighs* That's what I get for having a thousand tabs open of SPN spoilers.
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:*ducks*
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:It is; but he does kind of imply that she is that way because she's a woman.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:I had forgetten how much vitrol I still had for some books. And it felt good to write it out. Ahhhh, catharsis.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:Apparently I was the first person to nominate Laurell K Hamilton though. Bizarre.
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I just pretend that Edward killed Anita before Bloody Bones, which is my personal benchmark for when things really started to go Horribly Wrong in the Anita-verse.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:LKH had a few good ones at the beginning
Yeah, I did mention that in my original list. Sadly the wreck of the later ones has spoiled the early ones - it makes it easier to see where the rot was going to set in or something.
I just pretend that Edward killed Anita before Bloody Bones
I like that theory :-) I think I read Bloody Bones... I've kind of blotted them out, but I definitely read the first 5 or 6 before I decided life was too short to carry on with that series.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:*is horrendously unobservant but amused*
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Have you read Neil Gaiman's "The Problem of Susan", from his collection of stories Fragile Things? You could almost call it him writing a piece of fanfic, attempting to make it work in his head. He said this about it (from outtakes of an Onion article, near the end of this post:
"It’s just one of those moments where you look at a children’s book and there’s a thing that sticks in your head and irritates you. ... So I was trying to write a story that would address that issue, and also the wider issue of how people relate to children’s books and death. It is an intensely problematic story, and I don’t actually know if it’s any good."
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:after-party, LOL!
*goes to read link*
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:I always hated Moby Dick. It will always go down in history as the one book that defeated me. I got to page 60 or so at the tenth time the man interrupted himself in mid-story to start ranting philosophically (this time it was 'Phaethon's Folly' at the masthead) and i just couldn't take it anymore.
Cooper, i butted thru Deerslayer and Mohicans and decided the Day-Lewis film had actually BETTERED the book rather than chopping it up. A first for me; usually that kind of restructuring pisses me off, but that was the first time i preferred film to novel. There are a few other exceptions since, but that one was the first.
a prof of mine in HS said she thought some books were considered 'classics' simply because there just weren't all that many books around, so anything that survived to get on the list was read by everybody who knew how to read and was therefore an automatic classic...regardless of actual story merit. LOL, well, i'm sure it also has to do with changing styles, shorter attention spans in our generation, etc, but i still think she has something there.
oh, and RE Susan, i never read that as a sexuality thing. Never occured to me till now. huh.
i still mourn it, though.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:The books I hate are mostly ones where I feel a great story or idea has been ruined somewhere in the execution, like 'The Crimson Petal and the White' which I loved right until I finished it: the ending sort of reached back into my memory and poisoned my enjoyment of the rest of it, which was very annoying. Or Imajica: mind-blowing premise but remains the only book I've ever been disgusted with the author's apparent view of women.
(- reply to this
- link
)