Wednesday, September 12th, 2007 01:23 pm
i need to stop reading yahoo
When you realize you have been studying too hard:
The Prototype For Metric Mass Is Shrinking!
The 118-year-old cylinder that is the international prototype for the metric mass, kept tightly under lock and key outside Paris, is mysteriously losing weight — if ever so slightly. Physicist Richard Davis of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Sevres, southwest of Paris, says the reference kilo appears to have lost 50 micrograms compared with the average of dozens of copies.
...yeah. I had a moment of panic--the constant! The constant!, then rememberd, right. This doesn't actually affect me.
Right. I spent the meeting today gleefully changing everyone's age to base four, eight, eleven, and binary. Let me just say, still more productive than sitting through that meeting. Also, I need to check my work. I'm not sure about the four base.
The Prototype For Metric Mass Is Shrinking!
The 118-year-old cylinder that is the international prototype for the metric mass, kept tightly under lock and key outside Paris, is mysteriously losing weight — if ever so slightly. Physicist Richard Davis of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Sevres, southwest of Paris, says the reference kilo appears to have lost 50 micrograms compared with the average of dozens of copies.
...yeah. I had a moment of panic--the constant! The constant!, then rememberd, right. This doesn't actually affect me.
Right. I spent the meeting today gleefully changing everyone's age to base four, eight, eleven, and binary. Let me just say, still more productive than sitting through that meeting. Also, I need to check my work. I'm not sure about the four base.
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:50 micrograms is roughly equivalent to the weight of a fingerprint.
Maybe someone cleaned it.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:We learned base 8 when I was in fourth grade - that was about the only thing I liked in math.
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:God, you learned base eight in fourth grade? *bitter*
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:At the time, when they gave us the Iowa Educational Development Tests, I always tested higher in math than anything else, so I was in some kind of torture chamber gifted math class. Fortunately, the math part of my brain departed for greener pastures at the end of that year (or maybe it just got warped from all the base whatevers) and I thankfully returned to eating topographical maps.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:...no calculators? *shocky*
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:And yeah. Log tables no fun :(
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Weird, huh?
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I keep wanting to ask--why binary for computers? And why *do* we use a 10 instead of say, eleven? Is all of math really based on our number of fingers?
It's a very weird thought.
(I'm kind of getting dizzy by the 360 thing. Trying not to think about it.)
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I'd recommend the book -- it's more interesting than mind-bending. And I honestly think the answer would be a mixture of convenience and coincidence: yes, we have ten fingers, so it's easy to use them to count. But someone must have made a case for base-eleven that was considered and then discarded for whatever reason. We just need to wait till someone writes a book on the history of mathematical thinking.
Actually, another book you might be interested in is Mathematical Sorcery (http://www.amazon.com/Mathematical-Sorcery-Revealing-Secrets-Numbers/dp/073820496X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-5378351-2281647?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1189627214&sr=8-1), which is not so much a history of mathematical thought as a history of math itself -- how it developed from a way to count commercial items into what we know today. He makes the process sound a lot more inevitable than the author of Einstein's Clocks, but it's the same general idea.
YES, YES I AM THAT GEEKY. WHAT OF IT.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I always found it interesting why we use certain bases in certain areas. I mean, base 12 and 60 are fairly practical. Also IIRC, the hour still has 60 minutes, because the Sumerians used a Sexagesimal system in their math, and it just stuck, for the angles too, but it's kind of weird that we don't use that for everything then, but this weird mishmash. I mean using 60 is so practical because it has so many factors that you don't need fractions, so it's no wonder their system stuck for the everyday math, and nobody would think about turning time units decimal, but why use something different for the rest? I mean, nobody would use 11 as a base, because it is a prime, thus too few factors making calculations harder, but ten isn't much better and only really has the finger thing going for it.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:2)why *do* we use a 10...?
Idiot's answers (as in *from* one not *to* one:
1) Because switches only have two positions 'on' and 'off'
2) Because we all tend to have ten fingers...
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Why is a minute divided into 60 seconds, an hour into 60 minutes, yet there are only 24 hours in a day? (http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=231B40A6-E7F2-99DF-3EC857EC9DB18A45) With applicability to circles too, I'd think.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:That's just weird! I mean, who knows all the ages of her co-workers?
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Should see if Weight Watchers has any operatives around there.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:*geeks out*
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)