Thursday, November 4th, 2010 01:30 pm
cooks source bukkake - yeah, still not clicking on the jpg
In the interests of full disclosure, my work computer locked me out. It's tragic, really. But then I got to read this.
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
illadore posts Copyright Infringement and Me, sharing the heartwarming story of an editor of great (three decades!) experience in the publishing world who kindly and generously picked up one of her articles for her groundbreaking and experimentally-spelled magazine Cooks Source, and when illadore's ingratitude for her generosity was expressed via email, Judith Griggs politely but firmly explained the astonishingly simple legal statutes covering copyrighted articles found on a copyrighted page on the internet. And also has some truly astounding editing advice about the article.
More Links
Copyright Follies bynihilistic_kid
The Stupidest Thing an Editor With Three Decades of Experience Has Said About the Web Today by John Scalzi
Twitter search
ETA: Oh, look, it's Boing-Boing: Today's web justice driveby: Cooks Source Magazine
Facebook Links
Cooks Source Facebook Wall - might be a few people there a bit stroppy about the entire thing.
Cooks Source Facebook Discussions, hey, has anyone gotten the cooks-source-bukkkake to load?
List of Cooks Source article sources. Please add more and hey, interesting list here: Paula Dean, NPR, WebMD, WeightWatchers, Martha Stewart, Recipes Today that's owned by Disney, CNN....
Okay, if the eventual goal is guaranteed professional and personal immolation destined to be cherished by the eternal memory of the internet throughout history, post to youtube videos of torturing your goddamn cat, okay (please do not actually do this)? 4chan will take care of it for you, three days, four days tops, and then you at least get the biggest pizza party of your life. You really don't need to create an entire business enterprise with an elaborate and strangely mesmerizing chain of events to get it done.
Dude, you invoked Martha fucking Stewart. And Disney. There will be no pizza. I'm not sure there will be like, air when they're done.
Again, that's Cooks Source, no apostrophe, and Judith Griggs, that's two g's.
Yeah, I really needed this.
illadore posts Copyright Infringement and Me, sharing the heartwarming story of an editor of great (three decades!) experience in the publishing world who kindly and generously picked up one of her articles for her groundbreaking and experimentally-spelled magazine Cooks Source, and when illadore's ingratitude for her generosity was expressed via email, Judith Griggs politely but firmly explained the astonishingly simple legal statutes covering copyrighted articles found on a copyrighted page on the internet. And also has some truly astounding editing advice about the article.More Links
Copyright Follies by
nihilistic_kid The Stupidest Thing an Editor With Three Decades of Experience Has Said About the Web Today by John Scalzi
Twitter search
ETA: Oh, look, it's Boing-Boing: Today's web justice driveby: Cooks Source Magazine
Facebook Links
Cooks Source Facebook Wall - might be a few people there a bit stroppy about the entire thing.
Cooks Source Facebook Discussions, hey, has anyone gotten the cooks-source-bukkkake to load?
List of Cooks Source article sources. Please add more and hey, interesting list here: Paula Dean, NPR, WebMD, WeightWatchers, Martha Stewart, Recipes Today that's owned by Disney, CNN....
Okay, if the eventual goal is guaranteed professional and personal immolation destined to be cherished by the eternal memory of the internet throughout history, post to youtube videos of torturing your goddamn cat, okay (please do not actually do this)? 4chan will take care of it for you, three days, four days tops, and then you at least get the biggest pizza party of your life. You really don't need to create an entire business enterprise with an elaborate and strangely mesmerizing chain of events to get it done.
Dude, you invoked Martha fucking Stewart. And Disney. There will be no pizza. I'm not sure there will be like, air when they're done.
Again, that's Cooks Source, no apostrophe, and Judith Griggs, that's two g's.
Yeah, I really needed this.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
From:And Neil Gaiman's twitter, which might have a bigger readership than either of the above.
It makes me wonder how many publications of this sort are doing some internal checking right now. Stupid is rarely unique.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:fake twitter accounts
http://twitter.com/crookssource
http://twitter.com/cookssource_mag
http://twitter.com/cookssource
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(The rest of it is appalling however -- where do we suppose Ms. Griggs went to school that they taught her plagiarism and copyright violation are okay as long as it's from the Internet?)
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:*is very amused*
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:Obviously I hope they're screencapping like mad.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:*waving* toot toot go down the hole!
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:sexytricky..(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:"Cooks Source magazine masters new recipe: How to annoy the Internet"
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:And yeah, I had to edit this to correct the grammar. Ironic, huh? :-)
(- reply to this
- link
)
The rage of the internet is coming down on you, Judith Griggs.
From:And their server is now down. Awesome.
[edited to add: Twitter is overloaded too. Coincidence?]
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
*twitches*
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:I'm happy at the shitfest that's followed. Seems only fair.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2010/11/cooks_source_masters_new_recip.html
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/dailydish/2010/11/cooks-source-magazine-vs-the-web.html
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:Hello! There are lists of the many, many people who have been cut-and-pasted. Are they doing any research at all? Each time the first comment or so has been pointing this out. Why is the average reader of these locations more informed than the reporter?
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)