Wednesday, May 30th, 2007 01:57 pm
livejournal
Okay, so I am not one for dramatic public gestures--er. Except for that thing last summer? And maybe some stuff before that, which totally does not count since I started my resolution last summer. Now I do it under flock, like any sane fanficster.
But a few links:
Communities
fandom_counts
fandompays
Hmm
Look, the thing is, I get the people that are saying that we're all overdramatizing and it's not that big a deal, it's only lj.
No, wait, I said that wrong.
I totally do not get that at all. It *is* that big a deal. Yes, we started in fanzines, and then there was usenet, and then there was mailing lists, and then there was livejournal. Yes, if this fails, of course we'll find something else. There's never a doubt of that.
But that doesn't mean we can't try and fight for what we have now. It doesn't mean we'll win--that we'll get back those ljs we lost, the history and conversations and fiction in them that we may never see again--but I feel like we have to try.
As much as the mailing lists, as usenet, as fanzines, our history is here too. Almost everyone has had a mailing list suddenly vanish, usenet threads deleted, bad mods, and livejournal, if it did nothing else, gave us this; a history we keep to ourselves in our ljs, answerable not to listmods or usenet mods, but to ourselves. And apparently, SixApart.
So you know, labeling us who are upset as hysterical? Feel absolutely free to do so. I've been here since 2001. I met my closet friends here. I found my last two fandoms here. I met
svmadelyn and
trobadora and
amireal here (as examples, I seriously love all my flist to a ridiculous and probably vaguely unhealthy degree). I've invested in the equivalent of internet real estate here, the way I never could in any other forum other than my webpage. I've decorated. Well,
isilya decorated for me. But I helped. It's home.
It doesn't mean I can't create another one somewhere else, with new locales and new friends and new ways of organizing fandom. But I'm just not quite ready to give this one up yet.
Seriously. People don't argue and fight and try just because they know they're going to be able to change something; we all know the odds on that one. I'd just rather say I tried and failed.
Quick add
This was just contributed by
lydiabell
hxxp://pedoblogtracker.blogspot.com/
It seems to show a list of all ljs deleted. Can anyone verify accuracy? I'll double check the people listed yesterday keeping track and find out.
Also. So. What are the chances we can hit
news comment limit by say--*checks clock*--5:00 PM CST? That's 11:00 PM GMT, if I converted that correctly. Just try.
But a few links:
Communities
Hmm
Look, the thing is, I get the people that are saying that we're all overdramatizing and it's not that big a deal, it's only lj.
No, wait, I said that wrong.
I totally do not get that at all. It *is* that big a deal. Yes, we started in fanzines, and then there was usenet, and then there was mailing lists, and then there was livejournal. Yes, if this fails, of course we'll find something else. There's never a doubt of that.
But that doesn't mean we can't try and fight for what we have now. It doesn't mean we'll win--that we'll get back those ljs we lost, the history and conversations and fiction in them that we may never see again--but I feel like we have to try.
As much as the mailing lists, as usenet, as fanzines, our history is here too. Almost everyone has had a mailing list suddenly vanish, usenet threads deleted, bad mods, and livejournal, if it did nothing else, gave us this; a history we keep to ourselves in our ljs, answerable not to listmods or usenet mods, but to ourselves. And apparently, SixApart.
So you know, labeling us who are upset as hysterical? Feel absolutely free to do so. I've been here since 2001. I met my closet friends here. I found my last two fandoms here. I met
It doesn't mean I can't create another one somewhere else, with new locales and new friends and new ways of organizing fandom. But I'm just not quite ready to give this one up yet.
Seriously. People don't argue and fight and try just because they know they're going to be able to change something; we all know the odds on that one. I'd just rather say I tried and failed.
Quick add
This was just contributed by
hxxp://pedoblogtracker.blogspot.com/
It seems to show a list of all ljs deleted. Can anyone verify accuracy? I'll double check the people listed yesterday keeping track and find out.
Also. So. What are the chances we can hit
no subject
From:The difference, to me, is that the previous changes were natural progressions--things that, for at least a lot of fandom, worked better, or had things they wanted. Fandom (as a collective) "chose" to migrate to mailing lists. Fandom "chose" to go to LJ.
And when fandom "chooses" to go somewhere else, I'll be there. But I don't want to be *forced* there for any other reason than "hey, that's where the fangirls are."
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Also, icons are pretty.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:And their idiosyncratic definition of "interest" as "something I wholeheartedly support in reality" is utterly, utterly ridiculous. Nothing whatsoever justifies that, and I don't believe for a second that they are actually in legal danger because of listed interests.
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I mean, If it was truly such a huge legal problem that interests are searchable and can be used for criminals finding each other or whatever (and INAL so I have no real clue how bizarre internet law may get), wouldn't it be easier to disable the interest search mechanism as a stopgap measure and stick with deleting journals for actually reported, specific TOS violations, like they apparently did before? I mean, before they didn't have this liability issue when they responded to reports and actually checked the LJs, no?
I don't expect them to be on the cutting edge of electronic rights advocacy, and if they argued that comms with explicit chan were obscene and violate the TOS or something, I wouldn't like it, but I could follow their argument, and understand that they don't want to end up as the test case defending non-con underage Malfoycest as free speech in some court. But this blanket action without checking for actual TOS violations just makes no sense to me, and really, whether it is their legal right to act unreasonable in policing their site or not, I still prefer to give money to web services that act reasonable and in a transparent fashion, especially with making clear beforehand what is and is not allowed on their service.
I mean, how am I supposed to guess that say listing "slavery" as an interest because I like it fic might suddenly get me suspended, because after all it could be me soliciting human traffickers and clearly illegal? It's one thing if web services use their discretion to be on the cautious side and TOS you for something that may be a gray area, but this complete randomness (if they really intend all suspensions to be permanent rather than for some review process), just because they receive complaints from people who are apparently not even aware that "Lolita" is a book, that isn't inspiring confidence.
And following this kind of suspension for an interest without checking through they open themselves up for a ton of grudge complaints and LJ drama at the very least, as soon as people report their personal grudge for listing say "drugs" (along with a community containing some post about where to buy illegal drugs for better credibility) and expect a suspension or something. Not to mention the next random zealous internet group objecting to "obscenity" because they are the "warriors against moral corruption" or something that may report LJs for listing "dirty furry sex" or whatever (regardless of whether the LJ contains actually obscene furry sex content), or the RIAA asking to suspend everyone who lists "mp3 sharing" regardless of whether the LJ contains musig posts and so on.
(- reply to this
- parent
- thread
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:And yes, indeed - they've just shown just how easily they are blackmailed, and I'm betting people will jump on that and try to milk it for all it's worth. They've left themselves wide open. How come they didn't realise that?
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Also I'm curious if the interests concept has been fully explained anywhere and if anyone could walk into it, as you said, understanding how this makes them legally liable. IF NOT, as they haven't, I'm not sure if what they did really makes sense.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:That's what I suggested (with comment title) in the news post.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Excellent, I think. Considering that it's at *hits refresh* page 32 and counting.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:And the thing is this: After LJ has been successfully machined to suspend lj's because of outside powers, this same route would be easy to use to, lets say, take down all the accunts containing copyrighted material. And voila, that would be the end of the sroty for fandom in LJ.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:Thanks for that. I know the chances of my journal getting hit are slim to none, and this will all boil off soon enough, but that's beside the point.
The point is that LJ *is* home. And it feels like we've been invaded. That's what got to me yesterday - locking down my journal, for me, was the equivalent of shutting myself in the closet with the phone waiting for the bad men to leave.
Which, yeah, sounds overly-dramatic and hysterical, but you know what? I don't care. I'm a stay at home mom who homeschools her special needs child, living a thousand miles away from her friends and family. LJ is how I connect with the world, I don't have a whole lot of other options right now if I want to have a conversation that doesn't involve Pokemon.
Yesterday I stopped feeling safe here, and that hit me really harder than I thought it would. It's nice to know I'm not the only person having a strong reaction to all this, you know?
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:In RL, I'm always reminded that we never really know what's going on with people. LJ has that too, of course, but there are so many ways that we *are* able to share the amazing and horrible and tedious and freaky, weird things that we all have in us.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I totally do not get that at all. It *is* that big a deal. Yes, we started in fanzines, and then there was usenet, and then there was mailing lists, and then there was livejournal. Yes, if this fails, of course we'll find something else. There's never a doubt of that.
But that doesn't mean we can't try and fight for what we have now. It doesn't mean we'll win--that we'll get back those ljs we lost, the history and conversations and fiction in them that we may never see again--but I feel like we have to try.
I'm happy to link back here. Want to pimp
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:I keep watching fandom_counts go up in numbers and smile *so much*.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:Seriously, I like it here. LJ has been my gateway to and as-good-as-only source of fandom.
re: f_counts: 4100 and rising. :))
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:Sure fandom can find another place to go and build up the community again but it's just, the whole way this is going down is putting a bad taste in my mouth.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:I'm using the Ronon icon because he's pretty. That's why.
(- reply to this
- thread
- link
)
no subject
From:Sorry, that's right, important things are happening. Can't focus on the naked chest. There's war to be had.
(- reply to this
- parent
- top thread
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:I've locked down most of my fic, and I'm considering deleting because of the way this ties in with personal RL risks to my job.
*sigh*
I hate this. The lack of verification or investigation is unconscionable, and really the complete paper tiger that is the Warrior site should not be able to make LJ admins turn their backs on the ethos of their own organizations.
(- reply to this
- link
)
no subject
From:makes me wonder just how far LJ will go to satisfy the ~witch hunters~ as I'm sure that there are those out there who could find even the most general fic offensive...
I would miss this community terribly and would certainly follow my flist wherever their next port of call happened to be... I just hope it doesn't have to leave.
Am also impressed with the climbing numbers!
(- reply to this
- link
)