![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
banned books: really?
Banned Books Week: Banned Books That Shaped America which lists off some banned books and where and sometimes why they were banned. I'd like to thank Texas for the following, because God knows, this makes us seem sane:
...yeah, I got nothing.
(Note: If by community values they meant "our community does not value this level of epic boredom at this length", okay, maybe I can see it. I have a feeling that is not the case.)
I'm trying here, so hard. I'm failing. I--what?
Not Texas (I hope, please), but huh?
...I have never seen this penis. Jesus, I need to find that book and where's waldo this like, soon.
...where the hell is the porn in here? Did I miss this chapter? What porn?
(Note: Again, boring, and also, the Adultery Baby is freaky like hell; that kid alone might justify banning just to have less hideously precocious babies wandering around. Then again, that was the most interesting part of the book, even if it was born of fear.)
More details on that here. I mean, it kind of mocks itself just reading the justification, to be honest.
For more adventures in limiting the vastness of the human experience as expressed in literature due to reasons, Banned Books Week website and ALA's Banned Books section.
Moby-Dick; or The Whale, Herman Melville,1851
In a real head-scratcher of a case, a Texas school district banned the book from its Advanced English class lists because it “conflicted with their community values” in 1996. Community values are frequently cited in discussions over challenged books by those who wish to censor them.
...yeah, I got nothing.
(Note: If by community values they meant "our community does not value this level of epic boredom at this length", okay, maybe I can see it. I have a feeling that is not the case.)
Stranger in a Strange Land, Robert A. Heinlein, 1961
The book was actually retained after a 2003 challenge in Mercedes, TX to the book’s adult themes. However, parents were subsequently given more control over what their child was assigned to read in class, a common school board response to a challenge.
I'm trying here, so hard. I'm failing. I--what?
Not Texas (I hope, please), but huh?
Where the Wild Things Are, Maurice Sendak, 1963
Sendak’s work is beloved by children in the generations since its publication and has captured the collective imagination. Many parents and librarians, however, did much hand-wringing over the dark and disturbing nature of the story. They also wrung their hands over the baby’s penis drawn in In the Night Kitchen.
...I have never seen this penis. Jesus, I need to find that book and where's waldo this like, soon.
The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne, 1850
According to many critics, Hawthorne should have been less friendly toward his main character, Hester Prynne (in fairness, so should have minister Arthur Dimmesdale). One isn’t surprised by the moralist outrage the book caused in 1852. But when, one hundred and forty years later, the book is still being banned because it is sinful and conflicts with community values, you have to raise your eyebrows. Parents in one school district called the book “pornographic and obscene” in 1977. Clearly this was before the days of the World Wide Web.
...where the hell is the porn in here? Did I miss this chapter? What porn?
(Note: Again, boring, and also, the Adultery Baby is freaky like hell; that kid alone might justify banning just to have less hideously precocious babies wandering around. Then again, that was the most interesting part of the book, even if it was born of fear.)
The Words of Cesar Chavez, Cesar Chavez, 2002
The works of Chavez were among the many books banned in the dissolution of the Mexican-American Studies Program in Tucson, Arizona. The Tucson Unified School District disbanded the program so as to accord with a piece of legislation which outlawed Ethnic Studies classes in the state. To read more about this egregious case of censorship, click here.
More details on that here. I mean, it kind of mocks itself just reading the justification, to be honest.
For more adventures in limiting the vastness of the human experience as expressed in literature due to reasons, Banned Books Week website and ALA's Banned Books section.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
The other section of Moby Dick that seems to bother such types is the harvesting of the spermaceti chapter, which always amuses me. Sure, the chapter is also a consideration of romantic male friendship, as are big chunks of the entire book. But literally? Whale spermaceti is closer to ear wax than any bodily substance censorious types usually worry about, something they could've found out by spending less than a minute with a kid's encyclopedia (I checked).
Yes, I'm a big Moby Dick fan, I admit it. Someday I'll get my Yuletide request filled.
no subject
Porn is very much in the eyes of the beholder. With Victorian novels, it's the inference of sex. 'Tess of the D'Urbervilles' was banned as porn; when I read it, I skipped right past that bit, which was Tess falling asleep and a man going to his knee and reaching out toward her. Cut to the next chapter, where she has a child. I don't remember Hawthorne that well, but I suspect it's similar.
Stranger in a Strange Land probably got overtly slammed for free love (which is text) but it probably was covertly considered suspect for its literal interpretation of some parts of early Christianity that aren't done in the mainstream any more -- such as living communally, sharing all things in common. And, oh, yeah, the idea that women could actually be able to choose when they wanted to become pregnant. Radical, in the era before the pill. And, considering the conservative Republican assault on women's rights and contraception, it's still a radical notion to some that women are people, and are equals to men.
Porn is very much in the eyes of the beholder. With Victorian novels, it's the inference of sex.
One young man went for horror and read the bit of Dracula with the three brides. He meant it to be terrifying, I really honestly think he did. But ... um ... class of twenty years olds and... well it was horribly embarassing, at least.
I do not remember my own choice, but I remember his reading.
no subject
Yeah, I know, the questions just start bubbling up like yeast, and no, I didn't ask them...
no subject
No need to Waldo the penis, it is quite obvious, it is on the naked baby. It's nothing shocking, the boy is naked and fig leaves don't fit into the story, ergo penis. It's not like it's an adult or erect penis, it's just a little boy. Are the banners trying to hide the fact that boys have penises? I think at least half the child population knows that, plus anyone who baths with their brother or has a little brother because if there's a way to stop a little boy getting it out I have yet to find it. My boy was so delighted with the easy access when he got out of nappies that he went around showing his to everyone. So maybe there are one or two girls who haven't seen one, haven't traded viewing rights in the playground, isn't it a good idea for them to learn about it young, rather than getting a horrible shock when they're older?
no subject
there's a way to stop a little boy getting it out I have yet to find it
You and me both. ROFLMAO
"DUDE! Put that thing away...I don't need to see it, kthx. We only do that in the bathroom or the bedroom, remember?"
"Oh yeah. RIGHT!" *zooms off to his bedroom*
no subject
I think it's when he's falling into the milk, possibly. Don't ask me what point this comes at, I'm just remembering "penis" and "falling into milk" is the mental imagery I'm getting.
no subject
I have 2 young children and it's a favourite book of theirs. I've read it a lot.
no subject
Maybe the people who banned it weren't philosophy fans.
no subject
no subject
Stranger in a strange land is just awful after about the 1/3 point - it goes from interesting sci-fi to "wait... did the Scientology guy write this?" - but I believe that there's polyamory, atheism, and cannibalism in it.
no subject