seperis: (Default)
seperis ([personal profile] seperis) wrote2012-01-11 08:08 pm
Entry tags:

yeah, no, and fuck you

Really.

On behalf of those of us who were and are single women on welfare with children in the South and at some point in our lives lived in a--I need to check the wording--"rural south USA in a welfare slum trailer"--and who do not think our population should be fodder for your smug little war on the word shack:

Fuck. You.

Are you fucking serious?

Are you comparing lower income women's lives--and since you used the word 'welfare', we all know you're talking about women, who make up the majority of welfare clients; women, whose choices and lives are limited by poverty and the difficulties raising children alone, without spousal support; poor urban women, a population that is statistically more likely to be battered by their male partner--to a fucking challenge using the word shack?

I suppose [personal profile] indywind felt it was 'problematic' to use the term 'trailer trash'; should I be grateful? Thank you. Your buddies in that thread who were so excited to read it--and that super clever "Now them's fightin' words!!!" jab--also have my abject gratitude that parts of my life--and my family, friends, and clients from when I was a caseworker who decided benefits for those renters of "rural south USA in a welfare slum trailer"--are being held up in humourous example of how southern poverty is totally like using the word shack. I feel as if social justice is on my side.

So, my night is shit. How's everyone else doing?

[identity profile] bibliotropic.livejournal.com 2012-01-12 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
This, yes.

The OP appears to be trying to make a post about the housing and infrastructure crisis in Attawapiskat and fannish appropriations of rural and First Nations poverty ends up making an incredibly misguided one about U.S. perceptions of Canadian (urban, middle class, white) national identity. I think the person who posted the comment meant to make a parallel between lower income women's lives and the lives of people on the Attawapiskat reserve, to suggest that it's inappropriate to write smut set in either location, but in the context of that post, which kind of oozes privilege (the discussion of what a "shack" is), it really fails and is offensive all around.

Also feel free to delete this.

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2012-01-12 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
No, response to someone else's asking for clarification on teh main issue is fine. I'm not objective enough at this point to summarize it without that particular horrific comment coloring my view of their arguments.