yeah, no, and fuck you
Really.
On behalf of those of us who were and are single women on welfare with children in the South and at some point in our lives lived in a--I need to check the wording--"rural south USA in a welfare slum trailer"--and who do not think our population should be fodder for your smug little war on the word shack:
Fuck. You.
Are you fucking serious?
Are you comparing lower income women's lives--and since you used the word 'welfare', we all know you're talking about women, who make up the majority of welfare clients; women, whose choices and lives are limited by poverty and the difficulties raising children alone, without spousal support; poor urban women, a population that is statistically more likely to be battered by their male partner--to a fucking challenge using the word shack?
I suppose
indywind felt it was 'problematic' to use the term 'trailer trash'; should I be grateful? Thank you. Your buddies in that thread who were so excited to read it--and that super clever "Now them's fightin' words!!!" jab--also have my abject gratitude that parts of my life--and my family, friends, and clients from when I was a caseworker who decided benefits for those renters of "rural south USA in a welfare slum trailer"--are being held up in humourous example of how southern poverty is totally like using the word shack. I feel as if social justice is on my side.
So, my night is shit. How's everyone else doing?
On behalf of those of us who were and are single women on welfare with children in the South and at some point in our lives lived in a--I need to check the wording--"rural south USA in a welfare slum trailer"--and who do not think our population should be fodder for your smug little war on the word shack:
Fuck. You.
Are you fucking serious?
Are you comparing lower income women's lives--and since you used the word 'welfare', we all know you're talking about women, who make up the majority of welfare clients; women, whose choices and lives are limited by poverty and the difficulties raising children alone, without spousal support; poor urban women, a population that is statistically more likely to be battered by their male partner--to a fucking challenge using the word shack?
I suppose
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, my night is shit. How's everyone else doing?
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(I noticed my sarcasm didn't convey well on that post and I apologize if it seemed like I was supporting this.)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
An actual, factual Canadian shack. In which I am sure people had sex, though perhaps not my Granny (and if she did, I don't want to know about it).
On the other side of the family, my cousin Dale's place, well, it's more of a singlewide. Or maybe a doublewide. I'm not actually sure, as I've never physically seen it, and her FB descriptions (usually when she has an electrical fire, or has to escape a forest fire) aren't what one would call vivid. But it is a shack in spirit.
And you know, I get being pissed about the American Elephant. More, perhaps, than many people with Canadian citizenship, because I live in the states and it chafes me daily. But holy SHITBALLS, that's not the way to respond to it.
no subject
And it's a fairly typical example of the village where my mother grew up.
I found the whole framing of the argument smacked of classist bullshit, failing to articulate things in ways that made me sympathetic to the arguer. Perhaps it was the mention of the OP's cabin that caused my heels to dig in and make me want to write everything in a Canadian shack.
Christ knows, I know my way around them.
The Katrina thing... I think my head exploded.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I am about three steps away from taking a flamethrower to it all.
Would you like to join me?
Love and Anger,
Ami
no subject
Not the kind that puts fires -out-, the other kind.
no subject
...and I see Katrina's now part of the equation. Well, fuck them.
JFC
/pissed off icon is pissed off
no subject
no subject
no subject
All I could figure was that the term "shack" in the original poster's regional/social dialect must carry with it a radically different assortment of connotations than it does in the dialect of speakers from other regions/social groups . . . and that was before the First Nations came into the argument from somewhere out in left field.
no subject
Please, tell me.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
<rural canadian, single mom, previous welfare recipient credentials>
(no subject)
A somewhat better response than my rushed last one
The White Knighting syndrome enforcing language policing in the name of disability rights is bad enough-and I'm sick of hearing how if you're disabled and disagree with it you're a self-loathing disabled person, now it's all over the place for just about anything. I won't pretend I'm surprised by this kind of bullshit, dogpiling is already considered oppressive in some circles, but you have my sympathies.
Re: A somewhat better response than my rushed last one
Amen. I am at the point where I believe this stuff to be sincere instead of thinly disguised fandom grudges about .05% of the time. Which is a shame, because the genuine discussions have long since been drowned out by the sound of all those axes to be ground.
Re: A somewhat better response than my rushed last one
Re: A somewhat better response than my rushed last one
Re: A somewhat better response than my rushed last one
Re: A somewhat better response than my rushed last one
Re: A somewhat better response than my rushed last one
no subject
no subject
I mean, I'm in the South, have kids, and lived in a trailer for until 18 months ago.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
can offer sympathetic ear, and u-r-a-friend noogies? (hopes he's not being rude)
no subject
no subject
...
...
...I got nothin.'
no subject
However, I do think "shack" in the context of "what real people who live in the rural north of Canada have to live in" can be problematic. If you type "Canadian Shack" into google, you get Ces' challenge. If you type in "First Nations shack" into google, you get Shacks, slop pails on Wasagamack First Nation (CBC.ca). It's a crisis in Canada that we've totally failed to deal with. Me, personally, I'm not going to get up in arms about the Canadian Shack challenge, though someone else with legitimate problems with it might.
Seperis, again my apologies if you'd prefer that I don't try to redirect the conversation. I can always take it elsewhere and you're free to delete my comment.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
So, um, it's not intentional, probably just badly worded/contexted.
no subject
Threatening to write it in a fit of classist outrage is...I have no idea what that is, but it's sick.
(no subject)
no subject
/random comment
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-12 04:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-12 05:14 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-12 08:40 am (UTC)(link)I had a similar reaction to yours a few months ago upon reading someone's post who -while ranting against a supposedly anti-Chinese article- was sideswiping Europe apparently without even realizing it, and all her friends then cheerfully agreeing to her superficially politically correct remarks.
As a European myself, I took a rather dim view of the whole thing and regret to say I am still furious about it. Not that said person would care, of course. What? We are not American, so we are below dirt? Thanks anyway.
Well, never mind all that, I'll go check out this un-PC challenge!
*hugs from one of your usual anon stalkers*
no subject
Until I moved to England six years ago, lived my entire life on and around First Nations reserves. I've even been to Attawapiskat, which the staranise linked to information about. In contrast, many or even most Canadians have never been on a reserve.
Reserves can be very deprived and have a lot of problems, but they are usually also great, close-knit communities. Including Attawapiskat! They are more than a convenient example of 'shackland' and infrastructure crises to support a rant against a tongue-in-cheek internet challenge.
The whole conversation has put my back up something fierce. I feel like it has reduced both northern First Nations and Southern communities to nasty, dreary little places -- and I guess it is therefore no wonder staranise doesn't want to be associated with places like that.
no subject