seperis: (Default)
seperis ([personal profile] seperis) wrote2008-02-17 04:26 pm
Entry tags:

romantic shenanigans are like music, you just need to know what you're hearing

The one thing that's hard for me to admit in fandom is, ironically, my shameless love of the classic bodice-ripper. I mean, as a woman, they hit my non-con and etc buttons, but--there's this part of me that wallows in the delicious rippling pecs of the Viking warrior as he kidnaps the tiny buxom Saxon maiden from her father's keep and takes her to his mountainous fortress for hours and hours of ravishing. Hours and hours of ravishing.

It's like, not only am I going to hell in a handbasket, I bring the tea and scones along with me.

I really, really want more of this in fandom.



It actually is something I was talking about with [livejournal.com profile] amireal while we were furtively doing a compare/contrast in our Folders and Bookmarks of Silence we do not talk about and set off my desperate search for Wraith!Queen Rodney, because mind-control is an occasional kink. And in Serious Good Fic I like it--but I roll over like a log when it comes with h/c and delicious delicious angst and magic healing sex attached and more angst and mass disapproval and then Everyone Is Sorry and then more healing sex. And a plus if someone somewhere tries to kill themselves before the healing sex, because that just makes it better.

It's even more annoying because the structure of a romance is usually considered badfic, and it's hard, hard to explain that when I recognize the structure of what I'm reading, how I read and interact with the text changes dramatically. Romance protagonists don't act like people, just like Great Literature people don't act like people, but you're a lot more likely to have people muttering about OOC in romance than Great Literature in fandom. The rules are different, and for some reason, it's really, really hard to argue literary merit.

And try convincing people that romance is not only legitimate but damn good and you will not only get the eye-roll but also the Oh Guilty Pleasure, which is true and makes me ashamed of the fact that I do it, too. And that, I think, is something I learned from fandom. I can compare and contrast romance authors I love with coworkers from system analysts to programmers to project managers to supervisors without missing a beat, but here? It might as well be a sign stating "Ah, those lowbrow interests! How quaint!" before they like, wonder about the state of your high school education and you know, there's a reason I don't drag out my credentials on literature--I don't have any. There's a reason. I never loved literature the way I love romance.

I am, however, a woman, and romance has long been associated with woman--women and bon-bons and soap operas and other, lesser forms of entertainment. You know, much different than Serious Social Issue Fiction and Serious Not-Dramatic But Very Deep Fiction or Serious and Not Over the Top Mission Fiction. Which are all totally awesome, because that's a different structure entirely. And satisfying, except they never have anyone fall desperately, passionately in love and duel to the death for someone, and when I want that, it's surprisingly hard to get.

I like romance. I like deathless proclamations of love and obsession and possessiveness and rivals fighting to the death. I love the word 'claiming' used mid-coital and anyone growling over their mate. I love characters using the word "mate" non-ironically. My fantasy fic is Rodney systematically killing every person John has ever, ever slept with in his entire life while John watches (and likes it!). It's just--call it reptile brain and lowbrow entertainment but it's not something that's easy to find since my flist does not rec this. None of us do. It's sad but true.

(Except for those of us in chat who furtively pass along links with "Oh my God you have to read this" and we dont' even bother with a disclaim of shame, because shame only belongs in the public eye. In private, I sit around debating the merits of Rodney's unwilling pregnancy and John trying to claw his way of the infirmary to get to his mate and sigh. God. Where is that link anyway?)

Well, I did, twice, and both times, the angst level beforehand was hysterical. Angsting over a rec.

My top two romance novels in fandom:

An Affair to Remember by Tira Nog
Coming Home by Xanthe

Once I tried to explain my instinctive reaction to Coming Home (possibly the most read fic in my folder) with "But then they fought over Rodney! I mean--he was going to kill Bates! And then John wanted to claim him! And was having a nervous breakdown about it! And there was bonding! They were soulmates! SOULMATES." And I will never get over the fact we do not get to see John hunt down Kolya after he cut up Rodney and John killing Bates (oh my God, I bet they did it barehanded and right in front of Rodney and I need to lie down and swoon now). I am going to live the rest of my life without that and it hurts, because in romance, nothing stands in the way of true love and there's a body count to prove it. And I want that. I'd pay for that. I have contemplated offering Xanthe money if she will write the rest of this series for me, because this is the fic I will keep the rest of my life and read until I'm eighty. It always has context, and I won't need the fandom to read it. It's romance. It's perfect the way it is.

That conversation did not go well. *sighs* And still doesn't. Pick a person, I try to explain that one, and it's--wow. I have yet to find anyone willing to sit and squee with me over that John and Bates fight. I hate the world so much.

An Affair to Remember was even harder for some reason--I kept having to flail and say "But his legs! And he was afraid he wasn't going to be loved! And the hat! And Monte Carlo! And first-time bottoming angst!" It was surreal. I could not comprehend why no one else was picking up on this. I just kept quoting things and saying "But they're in love! They're in love!" And it was like speaking Greek.

(This one, I have found squee-ers, but they refuse to divulge their names. Bastards.)

And Jesus God do I miss Karen McFaydden (spelling?). Now that was a woman who knew her hurt/comfort--not quite genre romance but close enough. That's art, that's romance, that's changing the baseline of the universe to say, this matters. Nothing else. And that shit is hard. I've tried and I've failed to do anything like these authors. It's not in me to absorb that structure so perfectly that I can make anything possible. I still try, but hitting the level of purity they pull off? I don't know I'll ever have the discipline or the focus or the ability to pursue that single thing without checking myself and thinking, but what will people say?

Romance--not all of it, but personal experience having read a wide swathe of it--the best stuff, the best stuff is the stuff that fucks off everything but the story. Everything is finding and keeping that one true love. People, animals, countries, planets in the way? Screw it. Bring out the swords, stunners, muskets, or phasers (or Doranda level bombs); it's pure in a way that no other fiction really is, focusing and honing itself on that single, shining goal of true love, no matter what, no matter what happens, bring it on because they will totally fucking conquer it.

The thing is--[livejournal.com profile] minisinoo once said that a lot of fanfic fell under the genre, and I half agree, but the truth is, if we are, we suck at it very badly. And I speak only for myself, mass consumer of the romance genre market from Harlequin Regency right down to Virginia Henley of the unlikely penis sizes and desperately small women to Johanna Lindsay and Jude Deveraux and Judith McNaught and Amanda Quick and Catherine Coulter. We do not do what they do. None of us narrow the universe down to two people and the dynamics between them, the choices they make that are entirely personal and intimate, the bright, shining focus on them. And it's a gift as much as any other, and an art that's so desperately unappreciated it blows my mind.

*sighs* I miss healing sex and angsty hurt/comfort and true love forever. I don't like all of it (I barely like what I write, much less what other people write), but when it's right, when I feel that flicker of recognition--sometimes in the first word, sometimes not for pages (Coming Home hit me out of nowhere; I didn't know what I was reading until the second part when I saw what it was, and then I was sitting at her lj every week waiting for an update and yelling at [livejournal.com profile] svmadelyn for every minute it was delayed), when the familiar structure of it falls around me and the part of my mind that's looking for it unfolds and wakes up warily to see "Is this it? This one? Are you sure? Because it sucks to almost get it and then it be something else."

And I get to say, "Yes. Yes. Finally. This one."

When I find it, it's perfect. It's a reading high like no other, and one I can come back to three fandoms later and wallow in, because the structure is still there and I still love what it is.

The thing is--the thing is, it's not bad, and I shouldn't be guilty that I love it. And you'd think that I could break the habit of years in fandom with the prize going to Deep, Meaningful, Socially Relevant, or Choose Your Issue.

I really need to run through the archives again. I know there has to be more of it.

[identity profile] batdina.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
I read whatever I like and I never apologise for it.

What I write versus what I share after I've written it? that's between me and my therapist.

I will say this: I'll tolerate a whole lot more romance in fan fiction than I will in pro fiction. I usually figure it's because I only like the tropes of romance when they involve characters I already care about. But that might be a post for another day.

And for whatever reason, I have a mixed relationship to Xanthe's work that goes back to when she was writing my pairing in X-Files. Sometimes she knocks my socks off, and other times ... and again, I suspect that has more to do with me than with her.

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
*thougthful* I didnt' like General and Doctor Sheppard becuase I couldn't handle the contrast there at all. Coming Home worked far better because I didn't need to stretch between two worlds.

I've thought of looking at her X-Files. It wasn't my fandom, but I've kind of wanted to try it. *thoughtful*

(no subject)

[identity profile] batdina.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 01:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] liresius.livejournal.com - 2008-02-20 07:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2008-02-27 08:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] liresius.livejournal.com - 2008-02-27 08:21 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] icarusancalion.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
Coming Home hit me out of nowhere; I didn't know what I was reading until the second part when I saw what it was, and then I was sitting at her lj every week waiting for an update and yelling at svmadelyn for every minute it was delayed

Correction. Coming Home was updated daily. Roughly 11pm to 12 midnight my time zone.

I'm not even remotely ashamed to admit that I was there at my computer hitting refresh every night. The most cynical, hard-bitten people in fandom were doing the same.

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Ahh, I was trying to remember what the timeline was. I remember I did not sleep much those nights. And yeah, my AIM contact list was *dead* then while we all read.

*sighs* Good times. I miss that so much.
ext_34570: (Gerard)

[identity profile] iiyorinn.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
*nods* Yep, what you said (far better than I ever could).

And if you have any more recs like those above, please feel free to share :)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
I only wish I *did*. Though I need to go through my bookmarks and seriously sort. *sighs* Now that will be a hardship of *re-reading* and all. *g*

[identity profile] demilo19.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
The rageprufrock Eureka cross over that has John blowing up whole continents to get to Rodney....*swoon*.
I'm with you. I want savage, brutal, would die for you love. And yes, I am ashamed of this in my personal life. As a feminist, there is a part of me despises that there is a large part of me that adores the idea of "claiming" so it is my guilty secret. But screw it. As a feminist, I get to decide what I like. So bring on the bodice-ripping romance of it all. I want to see John Sheppard's chest hair!

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Oh yes, that was a *good* moment. *happy at the memory*

And yes, all of that. Feral and single minded and *vicious*. Hell yes.

(no subject)

[identity profile] demilo19.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 01:59 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] mecurtin.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
As I've told you, I also wallow in "An Affair to Remember". "Coming Home" I hate with the fire of a million suns.

You know how you feel about slavefic? That's how I feel about the expression "claiming". Sayonara, I'm outa here, push the ejector seat button. The bizarre thing is that an "objective observer" would say *they're the same thing*. Is it a case of too close to my kink but not right there is the worst of all? Or what?

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
*thoughtful* Probably. But you also dislike bottom!Rodney, whereas I double kink hard on Top!John, so that may make a huge difference in reading. Romance, in some ways, for me anyway, is even more delicate a balance to get just right, because the plot *is* the characters. Everything in the story rides on that one thing, not spread out or with a secondary motive (ie social commentary or adventure fic) so the risk is a lot greater in hitting it right.

(no subject)

[identity profile] mecurtin.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 03:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 03:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seekergeek.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 09:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 15:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seekergeek.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 20:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-19 21:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 21:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seekergeek.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 22:10 (UTC) - Expand
ext_18066: Default (Default)

[identity profile] apple-pi.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sure someone has said this in already *doesn't read ahead*, but - I find that in RL, science fiction is treated that way, as well. I mean, yes, I self-select so that my group of friends is fairly geek-heavy, but it's only in the past few years that I've stopped being vaguely embarrassed, in the general public eye, that my taste in books runs to scifi and fantasy. They are seen as simplistic and silly, by people who've never read "The Gate to Women's Country" by Sheri Tepper, for instance, or "The Left Hand of Darkness," by Ursula LeGuin.

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
True. *thoughtful* Well, okay, my experience differs, because where I went to high school, I didn't know anyone who read recreationally so *all* of it was a thing to be hidden, and in college, it was normal to have a ton of scifi (though not fantasy).

Interesting. Hmm.

(no subject)

[identity profile] apple-pi.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 01:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] apple-pi.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] helene94.livejournal.com - 2008-03-28 18:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] batdina.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 02:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] alixtii.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 21:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] batdina.livejournal.com - 2008-02-21 03:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 01:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] apple-pi.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 01:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 01:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] batdina.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 02:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seekergeek.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 09:33 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] daydreamer.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
I love romance novels to a ridiculous degree, and yet I'm incredibly anti-romance when it comes to real life. The way I explain it to people is that, yes, I love to read about love at first sight and happily ever after and damsels in distress, but I also love to read about fairies and dragons and alien spaceships and lightsabers and I don't think I really believe in any of those, either. :)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
I try to spend at least ten minutes daily believing in all of it. *g*

Romance is for pragmatists

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-18 22:45 (UTC) - Expand
callmeri: wwx and lwj smiling at the end of The Untamed (and then Rodney realized he was in love)

[personal profile] callmeri 2008-02-18 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
I will gladly join you in standing up for romance novels! It surprises the hell out of everyone who knows me in RL (or anyone who reads my fic), but I love them. God, so much. I devour them like candy and re-read them again and again. Honestly, I could open my own bookstore with all the dogeared paperbacks I have lying around my house. You are NOT alone.

(I have to admit, though, that I really, really (really-really) disliked "Coming Home" -- but it had nothing to do with the romance/one-true-love of it all, which is all good.)

Also, someone needs to write that story where Rodney kills all of John's ex-lovers. Like, now. *needs*

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 06:31 am (UTC)(link)
Someone *does* dammit. *stares into the universe* Please. Soon.

(no subject)

[identity profile] manderkitty.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 15:53 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] emrinalexander.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
The Bates fight is totally squee=worthy. It's pure, undiluted Bodice Ripper - in one of the medieval ones I've got, there's the same scene, fought with broad swords.

On Sunday nights when I close at the store? It's totally dead and Barbzilla, the manager from hell has gone home? And my work is done? I hit the book and magazine aisle and shoot through at least one romance novel during the last two hours of my shift. Every week. Harlequins, not Harlequins, single title category contemporaries, bodice rippers, and did you know that Harlequin's born again romance line just started issuing HISTORICAL BORN AGAIN BODICE RIPPER NOVELS? The first one is set in 1066 just post conquest Britain and the dialogue is so bad it's glorious.

My favorite novel of all time is The Windflower - non-con, swooning heroines, a gay gay gay so very gay Henry Morgan the Pirate.

My favorite moment in Coming Home is when Sheppard invites Rodney out to the mainland and he's hanging in the mess hall waiting for Rodney, trying very hard to remain Totally Cool and the poor guy, dom or not, is FALLING APART because Rodney is, like, five minutes late. I knew then that handcuffs aside, this was a romance.

[identity profile] windbringer1.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
and the poor guy, dom or not, is FALLING APART because Rodney is, like, five minutes late. I knew then that handcuffs aside, this was a romance.

YES. He's all ::checks watch:: "10:01, 10:02, those botanists are laughing too loud over there, 10:04 ohgodhe'snotcomingigodienow". And then Rodney appears and looks so hot that Sheppard almost spills his drink. And just, yes. God. ::rereads::

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 02:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seekergeek.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 09:38 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] ithiliana.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sort of all yes yes yes but but but (now my favorite romance writers are from reading years ago, and I still own a bunch of them for fave rereads--Georgette Heyer, Elizabeth Peters, Mary Stewart, Barbara Michaels (AKA Elizabeth Peters)...but I fondly remember some of the early bodice rippers, and will admit to having major rapefantasies, where I'd put the sort of 'bodice ripper' plot you mention above (and in fact have written a few fics with that whole vibe, or at least attempted)).....and yes, there's a lot of those conventions in fandom (in fact Henry Jenkins claimed in earlier book that slash grew from adding romance elements to action adventure plots, i.e. Kirk and Spock).

I think over the *coffcoff* decades since I was desperate to find anything to read by women writers (all those great historical ones too including Dorothy Dunnett and pant pant Mary Renault!), romance has changed (I stopped when Harlequin formulas seemed to take over the market, and I know the one type of romance I don't much like is any story set in the "real" world--yawn, boring, realism, blah), and well fan fiction / slash fiction has changed too. I hadn't realize partso f fandom were being snarky about romance--I mean, how can this be, given the prevalence of OTPs and ship wars, and true love, and all that that exists? (Not to say those are all of the romance conventions but quite a few..)


Have you read Catherine Asaro by any chance? She's this physicist who blended romance and hard science fiction--I cannot get into her stuff but she has major fans, and has been one of the major originators of romance in original sf.

What I think differs for me (anecdotal only) is that I am a LOTR fan -- so the major relationship between say Boromir and Aragorn (or Sean Bean and Viggo Mortensen) is incredible--and no matter how brilliantly the stories mentioned in your post or comments make use of those same conventions, I am not the least interested in them--I need the context). Even though some of them are for shows I know, I'm not in the fandom, not that interested in the characters.

And what always and still floors me is that fans one one genre or media turn around and be all snooty about another genre or media--sheesh.

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 03:36 am (UTC)(link)
Me too. *sighs* And no, there wasnt' soemthing overt recently or anything, just a low-grade frustration with the general feeling on writing romance.

Plus, I really want soulbonding, darn it.

[identity profile] nymphaea1.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
God, I loved Coming Home. It was just so unabashedly committed to its premise. And you know, for as much as it gets criticized for being OOC, I truly don't think of it as being any more OOC than the work of some of the writers who are most often praised as being objectively good. It just went in the opposite direction from canon than most fanon tropes. And that's part of the reason why I liked it. It was just such a blessed relief (and really hot) to see John physically in charge and aggressive, and for Rodney to have equal control but not total. Honestly, she sold me on what canon Rodney would get out of being a sub better than almost any BDSM writer has done for him and as no writer has done for John.
Edited 2008-02-18 02:59 (UTC)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 03:21 am (UTC)(link)
Let me just say word, word, word, word, and word.

And dear God the hot. So hot.

*fans self in memory*
ext_1637: (Default)

[identity profile] wickedwords.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 03:25 am (UTC)(link)
I reread very little, as I am a slower reader compared with my friends, and there is always so much new stuff out there that sounds interesting. (50+ stories on the to-read list and counting.) Coming Home is one of the few stories in this fandom that I have reread. Utopian D/s romance can make me very happy, but it requires some good world building and character-driven, relationship-oriented conflict. A lot of the stories that fandom labels romance don't work for me as there is no real conflict, or the conflict is entirely external; frequently, this is why story sequels and series don't work for me as the author shot their character-driven and relationship-driven worldbuilding stuff back in the first story, and there wasn't anything left for the next. Coming Home bucked this trend by having defined the conflicts in story one (the General and Dr. Sheppard) but making me see and feel them in story two. It was different because of that, and totally awesome.

At the same time I love the emotional macro-level, at the line level, I wish she would have made better choices, yet at the same time, I don't know that I do if changing the wording would have hindered my emotional attachment to the story. Color me conflicted, but I am an emotional junkie and I want stories that pander to me--only I want it with word choices that don't occasionally make me cringe.

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 03:35 am (UTC)(link)
*winces* I could have lived without anus being used. Really, really could have. Was tempted to find/replace that one. But I have weird word quirks.

(no subject)

[identity profile] wickedwords.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 04:08 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] green-grrl.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
Coming Home is totally on my recs page!!! God, yes. And I wasn't kidding about Mystic, before -- she has, like, three Jack/Daniel mpreg/kidfics that are totally my happy place because they throw over everything else in their lives to be onetruelovehappyfamilies together. Eeee! (Which is 180 degrees from RL me, but totally pushes my reading buttons.) Plus her other h/cs and at least one vicious fight-for-love ... oh yeah ...

(Nearly got derailed from responding by mention of Dorothy Dunnett, above, and was overwhelmed by a wave of Lymond-lust. GUH.)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 04:39 am (UTC)(link)
Mine too! God, love that story.

I am looking through Xanthe now. *Purring* So much delicious fic, so little time.

Romantic shenanigans etc....

[identity profile] maxinemayer.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 04:46 am (UTC)(link)
I'm with you, girl! You tell 'em!
Love, max

Re: Romantic shenanigans etc....

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 04:53 am (UTC)(link)
*grins* Thank you.

[identity profile] countess-baltar.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 04:58 am (UTC)(link)
The thing is--minisinoo once said that a lot of fanfic fell under the genre, and I half agree, but the truth is, if we are, we suck at it very badly. And I speak only for myself, mass consumer of the romance genre market from Harlequin Regency right down to Virginia Henley of the unlikely penis sizes and desperately small women to Johanna Lindsay and Jude Deveraux and Judith McNaught and Amanda Quick and Catherine Coulter. We do not do what they do. None of us narrow the universe down to two people and the dynamics between them, the choices they make that are entirely personal and intimate, the bright, shining focus on them. And it's a gift as much as any other, and an art that's so desperately unappreciated it blows my mind.

The trick is to believe in the romance tropes while writing, or, at least, let the characters involved believe in them. If they wander slightly out-of-character, it doesn't matter. Just about everyone acts dippy when they get into a new relationship.

If I can get away with sneaking in light opera romance conventions into fanfic, the literary romance genre ought to be possible. (I'm not into ravishing, hurt/comfort, slash, or smut. I much prefer gallantry, chivalry, witty retorts, and dancing.)

There are things that if the author or performer is thinking "This is stupid" or feeling guilty about the work, the reader or audience will pick up on it. They may not know why it feels insincere, but they'll know something is off.

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
The trick is to believe in the romance tropes while writing, or, at least, let the characters involved believe in them. If they wander slightly out-of-character, it doesn't matter. Just about everyone acts dippy when they get into a new relationship.

*snickers* And this is very, very true.

There are things that if the author or performer is thinking "This is stupid" or feeling guilty about the work, the reader or audience will pick up on it. They may not know why it feels insincere, but they'll know something is off.

Huh. I didn't quite think of it that way, but good point. If it feels like the author *believes* completely in what she's writing, and that she *loves* it and that she is one hundred percent into it--you're right. That might explain some of my reactions to some fic and not others adn why some just completely out there fic worked for me and some don't.

Fascinating. *pondering*

(no subject)

[identity profile] casspeach.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 06:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 07:02 (UTC) - Expand

I was going to be productive tonight. So that's shot.

[identity profile] tatterpunk.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 06:06 am (UTC)(link)
I wasn't going to break the silence on my covert internet stalking (Hi! I'm harmless!) until I'd finished the massive feedback email I'm working on to send you. But then you had to go and post this. And I clicked on the Affair link. I'm not even that far into it when I hit this:


He wondered what it was like to be Sheppard, a man who could just grin at the reporters when they snapped a photo of him kissing another man and mildly say, "You caught me, boys," like Sheppard had simply had it pointed out that he'd left his fly open, instead of being caught in a situation that would ruin most men's lives... Oh, there'd be some backlash to Sheppard's antics, a few articles declaring him a moral degenerate and damning him to hell for his unnatural proclivities, but on the whole, the press seemed to admire the man. It was hard not to admire someone so confident that he didn't give a damn what the entire world thought of him.


And I am so excited about what's coming I am literally biting the heel of my hand to keep from squeeing aloud. Oh god this is FABULOUS. Thank you so much for the recs! This calls for popcorn.

(I have nothing really substantial to add to the stigma on romance -- it's something that sets my teeth on edge, so I tend towards an ostrich routine. But... yes, liking romance novels is like declaring open season on your taste, intelligence, and even your grasp on reality. And I respectfully disagree with someone who compared it to the stigma placed on scifi/fantasy, as I've read in both genres and people's reactions were very different. Once an acquaintance, also a scifi/fantasy reader, tried to heckle me out of buying a romance book -- narrating an impromptu sex scene while we stood in the line to the cashier. He was buying Frederick Pohl's Gateway (http://www.amazon.com/Gateway-Heechee-Saga-Frederik-Pohl/dp/0345475836/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1203306536&sr=8-1), so I'm not sure what literary high ground he thought he was standing on.)

Re: I was going to be productive tonight. So that's shot.

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 06:13 am (UTC)(link)
I totally envy the fact you are reading this for the first time.

I love that story so much it's ridiculous. That cruise! Monte Carlo! THEIR LOVE IS SO AWESOME.

Once an acquaintance, also a scifi/fantasy reader, tried to heckle me out of buying a romance book -- narrating an impromptu sex scene while we stood in the line to the cashier. He was buying Frederick Pohl's Gateway, so I'm not sure what literary high ground he thought he was standing on.

*hysterics* I am never tired of people's reaction to different types of genre. It's like the funniest thing ever.

[identity profile] samdonne.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 08:00 am (UTC)(link)
Possessiveness (and its corollary, domination), jealousy, and their-love-destroys-continents are major (major) turn-offs, so I avoid romances like the plague. Although, to be fair to myself, it's less about looking down on a genre, and more the fact that 1) the inherent selfishness of some forms of relationships turns me off even "out in the world", so I don't want to read about it, and 2) I grew up in France. In our best love stories, everybody dies. I never learned to be fulfilled by Hollywood-type happy endings.

I am trying to figure out a common thread to my guilty pleasures. Perhaps guilty pleasure is what is easy and causes me no pain or discomfort at all, not the slightest twinge, so that nothing needs to be learned or overcome.

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I suspected you'd come down on that side of the romance debate from what you've said before and the tone of your fic in general.

Possessiveness (and its corollary, domination), jealousy, and their-love-destroys-continents are major (major) turn-offs, so I avoid romances like the plague. Although, to be fair to myself, it's less about looking down on a genre, and more the fact that 1) the inherent selfishness of some forms of relationships turns me off even "out in the world", so I don't want to read about it, and 2) I grew up in France. In our best love stories, everybody dies. I never learned to be fulfilled by Hollywood-type happy endings.

*thoughtful* For the first--it scares me on a real life scale because I've seen too many people like that to ever be comfortable with the reality of it. The idealization of it fascinates me, though, like chivalry and the concept of honor in its many forms; in the latter two, it's less how real it could be than the idea of the question beneath it that's constantly asked about what not people are, but what an individual chooses to be and what they strive to become when they want to be better. For whatever value 'better' is.

Ideally, true love means valuing someone else above self; their needs, their wishes, their existence, sometimes their wants, but mostly *them*. And personal honor, again for whatever value given, is the same concept; valuing a set of ethics above self, choosing to leash one's own wants and needs to something larger and greater. It's a choice, always a choice, to decide this is more important than what I want. And whether it's focused on a person, an ideal, a country, a higher being, saving a galaxy or just giving someone else the last pudding; that's extraordinary to me. What people choose to restrain themselves with is always different, but it's the same choice to abjure one's own wants in the service of something else that draws me in.

And you know, dueling. I am as one with my love of violence in fiction. Passion in all forms is an uncomplicated fascination to watch. And that's probably completely off-topic to your reply.

(no subject)

[identity profile] samdonne.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 07:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2008-02-26 22:14 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] cellia.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 09:16 am (UTC)(link)
I love romance novels too (and ravishment... huge kink of mine. not to be confused with rape), but I think that even with bodice-ripper romance, there are subgenres and everyone has their own preferred "flavor" of romance (regency, contemporary, fireman, widows, religious, time-jump, vampires etc). I *loved* Coming Home, but An Affair to Remember made me feel slightly queasy and embarrassed for the characters. But I don't think this means I have to turn in my "I-love-Romance" card! (I hope. I mean, I can still read Julie Garwood in earnest, which I feel should count for a lot.)

There is something wonderful about the earnestness of a romance novel... even the ones that have sarcastic and clever characters. The universe in a romance novel clings to the idea that love will conquer all. I remember reading about a publisher translating their romance novels for Japan, and the most important characteristic the new fans loved about these imports? The happy ending. (This is actually a huge draw for me in astolat's fic--I can trust her for joy and love conquering all and a happy ending, but not a cheap one.)

I don't think that most Romance (pro novels or fanfic) are serius bizness, but... so what? Most stories, even the ones we love--nevermind most fic--don't encompass life, the universe and everything. Should I mock a mystery for always being so predictable with those murders and then figuring out what happens in the end? It's even sillier when I think (memory of these stats vague) Romance novels account for something like a third of all paperback sales.

Basically, I always suspect that it's a deep down thing planted in our brains by society because Romance novels are for *girls.* They're predictable, we always know how it's going to end etc etc... I could say the same about a football game, which has rules and the obvious, predictable end, but no one makes fun of football. (not to dis football, or that it's the most prefect analog, just that it seems most male-associated hobbies/activities are fine, but female-associated ones are silly etc etc)

And, hm, this comment was longer than I meant it to be...

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Heh. No. Romance is so hugely varied, we all have our preferences on how we like to see it.

There is something wonderful about the earnestness of a romance novel... even the ones that have sarcastic and clever characters. The universe in a romance novel clings to the idea that love will conquer all. I remember reading about a publisher translating their romance novels for Japan, and the most important characteristic the new fans loved about these imports? The happy ending. (This is actually a huge draw for me in astolat's fic--I can trust her for joy and love conquering all and a happy ending, but not a cheap one.)

*nods* I want the happy. Very much.

Basically, I always suspect that it's a deep down thing planted in our brains by society because Romance novels are for *girls.* They're predictable, we always know how it's going to end etc etc... I could say the same about a football game, which has rules and the obvious, predictable end, but no one makes fun of football. (not to dis football, or that it's the most prefect analog, just that it seems most male-associated hobbies/activities are fine, but female-associated ones are silly etc etc)

I suspect a lot of it is the association with women; quilting, crochet, knitting, "home" cooking, all women's work. There's no value in these things because to admit their value is to admit women themselves have value for themselves, not for how they reflect men. *grins* Even in romance novels, sometimes, there's that one "masculine" oriented thing a woman can do--shoot a gun, do math, ride well--that leavens her, makes her interesting and "different" from those "other" women, because the other things are, again, without value. Not all romance, but some of them have that second of dissonance. It's jarring. I usually ignore it.

And heh. Football. God, I am always torn. It's boring to watch, but the last thirty seconds of a close game? Man, I am so there.

(no subject)

[identity profile] beckyh2112.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 05:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] cellia.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 20:43 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] mercurydraconix.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 09:23 am (UTC)(link)
I've never been that into straight-up romance, because... well, more than Pretentious Refusal to Read Things Lacking In Literary Merit, it was that the library of my childhood only had the ones with the UTTERLY RIDICULOUS (and awesome! so awesome!) covers, from like, the 70s and the 80s (god, so amazing, with glistening hairless chests and long windswept hair) and ... that turned me off. And I went to the High Fantasy and Space Opera place instead.

And okay, Heinlein is a literary genius, but lets face it - most Fantasy and SciFi is about on par with Romance, in terms of Pretentious Literary Merit. Somehow, though - childhood training, most likely - I find that I am more accepting of the tropes belonging to SF/F than to Romance. Part of it might have to do with my dislike of strong power imbalances between lovers, it's ... a mild to moderate squick.

I did meet a guy once who posed for covers of romance novels. I took a class on broadsword stage fighting when I was sixteen. (God, he was so pretty. His mother was there, and she had copies of his covers, it was so adorable. Also, goddamn, his hair was fucking fantastic, long and curly and jesus I wanted his hair even more than i wanted to dream about doing unspeakable things to him and then blush a lot because: sixteen.)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
OH man. *g* Sixteen? Really? *giggles*

[identity profile] lavvyan.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 10:13 am (UTC)(link)
Dude, if you need someone to chip in moneywise for that missing part between Coming Home and General & Dr. Sheppard? I'd totally organise a fundraiser with you.

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Man, one vague word of encouragement for her and I am so there. Dammit. I want John stalking Kolya!! And the final Bates confrontation! Because if he was like that before Rodney was collared, John would be freaking ballistic after.

(no subject)

[identity profile] lavvyan.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 05:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] liresius.livejournal.com - 2008-02-19 15:17 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] cat-77.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
because in romance, nothing stands in the way of true love and there's a body count to prove it.

Just had to say that is such an awesome comment, and oh, so true. :)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I am as one with my lack of shame. It is true.

[identity profile] tex.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 02:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Dammit. I'm offline for 24 hours and this is what I miss! I have a whole world of a past with romance novels, particularly of the historical romance kind. In fact, I have a three quarters finished one sitting in the cabinet of my study (back in the day before laptops, when I used to write free hand). And I think that the Harlequin SGA stories are some of the best of the fandom. And you mentioned Jude Devereaux and Judith McNaught! EEEEE! My girls from the old days!
callmeri: wwx and lwj smiling at the end of The Untamed (dorky!john 2)

[personal profile] callmeri 2008-02-18 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)
OMG, Judith McNaught wins at the universe. ♥ ♥ ♥

(no subject)

[identity profile] tex.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 21:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] callmeri - 2008-02-18 21:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2008-02-18 21:53 (UTC) - Expand
kernezelda: (reach)

[personal profile] kernezelda 2008-02-18 02:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Shameless romance is one of my favorite genres. Love conquers all, no matter what. Also, obsessive love to the exclusion of all else. Mmmmmmm.

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Hell and yes. That is what I'm talking about. *nodnodnod*

*happy sigh*

(Anonymous) 2008-02-18 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
And one doesn't even need the traditional ripped bodice in such works as Zane Grey's "Riders of the Purple Sage", in which the travel-weary hero's only beacon is his thirst for vengeance...until he meets the beseiged young widow, with her tanned and rounded arms, her clear and fearless gaze...and then there's blood and shooting and more blood and more shooting and steaming horses and lots of fleeing and hiding out in caves and nursing back to health.

And Rafael Sabatini, with Captain Blood and Scaramouche and Mistress Wilding - angst and shunning and torture and passion and more fleeing, plus sword fights.

And the secret passion of all the women in my family - Barbara Cartland. Her teeny, tiny heroines with their *enormous eyes* and little pointed chins (or, as my mother says, their little pointy heads), trembling yet brave as they're tossed over the saddle of the Sultan's minion. Rescued by the sneering Lord Vulcan, she nurses him back to health after the dreadful fire. her physical beauty hidden to him by the bandages around his eyes, but the beauty of her soul apparent as she gravely shares interesting facts about limestone and feldspar. Perfectly dreadful, and nowhere near enough blood, but we live for the moment when Lord Vulcan gives in to his passion, falls to his knees, clutching the hem of her skirt, and cries, "Mine! Mine! All mine!"

Eurydice

Re: *happy sigh*

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
You are killing me so much. So. Much.
terrio: (Default)

[personal profile] terrio 2008-02-18 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Have you ever tried reading Sentinel fic? Other than K/S, mentioned above, I can't think of another fandom so rich in bonding stories. Hell, even some of the gen fic had bonding! Seriously, what can you expect from a fandom whose canon includes mystical visions and one parter raising the other from the dead? Not to mention the whole living-together thing....

If you feel like taking a look (and haven't already), you might want to check out [livejournal.com profile] cesperanza's The Nature Series. For something that would be a bit less of a... commitment, I really like Legion's For the Grace of Blair, or, better yet, Stalking, and its sequel, Seduction. And on the longer side, there's [livejournal.com profile] ladyra's A Gathering of Sentinels, and its sequel, The Sentinel School... Um. Like I said: lots of bonding fic. :-)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
...I am entranced with one now that I literally cannot admit I follow avidly that involves slavery and mpreg. Entranced. I just--wow. Yeah. That fandom. Wow.

(no subject)

[personal profile] terrio - 2008-02-18 23:34 (UTC) - Expand

Page 2 of 4