Okay, so, this is fascinating to me. From what I've read in the comments, this isn't what you intended, but I didn't initially read the flashbacks as such. I went back through to check, and I think this piece -- amazingly-- works with those as past, present, or future. There's nothing specifically setting out the temporal relationship of the flashbacks and the present as you wrote them, I think, and the whole relationship could easily be cycling for the second time.

Which, honestly, I have the id-thing too, and I'm much happier with the way you intended it, because I don't really care about how fucked up everything else is when things end with the boys happy, but, *hands*. Creepy cyclical awesomeness.

Um, did this make any sense at all?