seperis: (Default)
seperis ([personal profile] seperis) wrote2007-09-09 04:07 pm
Entry tags:

huh. squee range.

Okay, so finally I sat down to sort through my bookmarks to read discussion on [livejournal.com profile] cesperanza's new fic--because I have done my homework. (Really. I mean, not all! But you know, some random amount.) So I deserve a reward. And chocolate milk.

Except--um. Is anyone discussing it *not* a member of academia or just really conversant with the themes of that? This is odd--but this is the first time in fandom I've felt my sheer lack of a degree in anything this strongly, because I am seriously *not able to follow* or really get into any discussion I've seen so far. But mostly, I just don't get what's being discussed. Okay, it's more the 'why' of what is being talked about. But it's also the feeling that I'm reading something in German but in this case, even throwing it through the translators isn't helping, as I have no translators and seriously. What are you people talking about?

It's very--I don't know. I wish for squee, but no place is squeeing on a level of "oh my god this is so awesome remember the part with the chair room" but mostly on the "did you notice the dissertation and footnotes of the x, y, z, it reminds me of that time back when I was teaching Very Horrifically Difficult Literature..." I am on a different squee range.

Er. That's kind of an exaggeration, but mostly not, because I'm serious, ,I am seeing in otherwise accessible ljs this entire--I don't know. It's like I'm missing some huge chunk of context. I keep having to fight down the urge to ask "WHY ARE WE DISCUSSING FOOTNOTE FORMAT" or something, because oh my God.

If I ask for an explanation of the squee range, is that going to show just dreadfully my terribly non-high-literature-inclinations so much that all will lose respect for me or something? I'm seriously kind of dazed by how inaccessible I'm finding a lot of these conversations.

Help? I'm kind of moving from dazed to the 'frustrated and annoyed' place and that can only end in staring resentfully at my laptop and eating way too much haagen-daz.

ETA: I now have people doing threads of squee and non-academic meta discussion. I have found nirvana. Yay!
ext_6615: (shepface)

[identity profile] janne-d.livejournal.com 2007-09-09 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Chiming in to say that I'm with you here - my academia experience is all science and I can't follow the literature-squee at all. I can see if you have that kind of background that it would be this amazing huge event, but I'm not really there.

I'm just going "cool story, love the bit where the chair made John orgasm, the whole seceding thing rocked". I did like the texts quoted a lot, mind, but I don't have any discussion other than "that was really clever". And I'm not that bothered about that, you know?

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2007-09-09 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes THE CHAIR THING! And the secession thing! And the political marriage thing! And the firing on the Daedalus thing!

*SQUEE*

I had many moments of squee.
ext_6615: (shepsunglow)

[identity profile] janne-d.livejournal.com 2007-09-10 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh yeah, squee all over the place.

As far as I'm concerned, the Chair should ALWAYS make John orgasm! And then he can try to hide it and be all embarrassed afterwards until Rodney finds out, and then there would be much sexing, both with the Chair and without.