seperis: (brothers grimm)
seperis ([personal profile] seperis) wrote2006-08-01 08:17 pm
Entry tags:

you have got to be kidding me

Hmm.

[livejournal.com profile] fairestcat was asking inclusive fandom events of het and slash and gen writers on and off of lj. This has very little to actually do with that--I got caught up with [livejournal.com profile] amireal's comment down in the threads.

Okay, first, a story. Because I always start with a story. It clarifies my point. Okay, it clarifies my point to me.



Part I

I've talked about this before, but what the heck, this is lj, we all forget everything but grudges in like, a week. So. A million years ago when SV was stil crawling out of it's diapers after a whirlwind first year--and God, that was a good year--there was a poster on ClarkLexFic--the fic only list, though someone brought the thing over to ClarkLex to debate it out--wait, too many hyphens. Start over. A person posted that there was a massive amount of present tense fic in ClarkLex and blah blah ickycakes whatever, not the point. Discussion took off, became kind of weird, but the word massive stuck in my head, along with the later commentary. Now, getting beyond my ego being bruised--since I was, you know, *posting* present tense fic all over the place, so to speak--I got curious.

Okay, in my defense, I had too much time on my hands, and at the time, I was in that place where I really, really wanted to be right. It was a rare moment where my desire to be right, right, oh my God I am so right eclipsed my inherent laziness. I enlisted a couple of people, gave them a section of the SSA, and asked them to go through and count the number of past, present, and future tense fic. And they really did, while I heckled from AIM. Seriously. I have no idea to this day how I convinced them to do that.

Okay, and becuase I'm just that dorky, I kept the results.

Smallville Slash Archive, circa August-September 2002

9 dialogue
24 multi
1 other
2 poetry
1 script

649 past
290 present
37 other

total 976

327 other than past

*****

66.5% = past

29.7% = present

3.8% = others

_______________

(current jenn comment: I think these stats cover a specific period of time--I think the week or month before I posted the stats, to make a comparison)

69

3 multi

28 present

38 past

Past = 55.1

present = 40.6

multi = 4.3

Okay, you ask, the point is?

Perception. It was perceived that present tense was beating past tense with a big fat stick of beatingness. Okay, by like, a few people on ClarkLex. They also said we sucked, but beside the point. Except I never would have gotten all inspired if I hadn't gotten all feelings-hurt, so you see, good things come out of trolling.

I lost my point. Anyway. Perception--strangling the poor past tense on their own intestines. Reality, less than a third of the entire archive. However--big however--the poster perceived the difference because in the last three months before I did this little study, the number of present tense fic were on the upswing in a serious way. And if you had come in during that time and hit the archive for latest, you just might get the impression that the fandom is All About the Present Tense. That I can almost prove, if I get really inspired and go back to study by date, but considering that i do remember what was being posted, I'm about eighty percent sure I'm right. May-August 2002 was a good time for the present tense fic in Smallville. According to the above, so was the month before this poll was posted.

I had a lot more in my diaryland account about this, but that is lost, so I'm working from memory of self-righteous satisfaction here.

Part II

The thing about the slash and het and gen separation thing is the idea that:

I still have no idea what the debate is about, exactly. On whether we should all be one large, multipairing, happy fandom where the slash layeth down with the het and watch all their tiny fic spawn play together. Or whether we separate far enough away that we never meet. Or whether the permeable edges are as permeable as we think. Or if That Other Pairing is out to get Our Pairing. Or if it's just preference, or it's actual exclusion, or if it's simply no one who is still bound by physical laws requiring sleep can *ever* read everything out there. I mean, we talk about it a *lot* without actually talking about it much at all, and this is why I rarely do meta right here--I don't understand where most of these conversations go. It seems like the catch-all for whatever is happening at the time that needs a label. Sometimes, it feels like the words 'slash bias' or 'het bias' (I don't think anyone's been accused of being gen biased--isn't that odd now that you think about it?) are used in ways that aren't covered by any actual usable definition to prove a point in a debate. To prove that someone, somewhere, at some point, was being oppressed by those other people.

I mean, the major serious divide between slash and het in a weird way comes down to which lower body orifice we're shoving a cock into*. Unless you count some adventurous het I've read. And even being aware it's more complex than that, it also weirds me out because it's like prostitution being the oldest profession--this is the oldest debate. Before we twitched for mpreg or muttered about incest and looked for the far-off cities of RPS that would be built, we were asking the question "why do you slash characters?" like it's a question that needs to be answered to make the concept relevant. Like that's even a question that isn't on the order of any zen-inducing question like "What is the sound of one hand clapping?" or "What would Jesus do?" It's a question with multiple answers of varying levels of coherency because it's not a question that can be answered to anyone's satisfaction because it cannot be answered. Not in any way that will ever make sense to anyone fully unless they share your brain.

I mean, if I meditaed? That would be my mantra. Right there. Clears my head *wonderfully*.

On the other hand, I always love reading the answers, so asking and answering? So not a complaint here. It's more that--it's so rarely asked for the right *reasons*. It's a complaint or an indulgence or a--an accusation? The question always seems to actually be, "why don't you write het?"

Every time--every time--this debate is dragged out and aired--the number of x/x or x/y fic compared to another is a big one, but also always fun is the infrequent challenges that exclude this or that pairing/group for one reason or another, or the archive that says no whatever pairing/rating/genre or the random troll that wanders by with homophobic or heterophobic commentary that are somehow--and don't even ask me how this happens--are immediately proclaimed The True Voice of the Other Side. Like there is some secret cabal of slashers (hetters) out there quietly working to eliminate everyone who doesn't write their pairing and take over fandom so the one true vision is revealed.

Does anyone--and I'm serious--actually believe that? I mean, really, truly, you sit down and think to yourself, those *slashers* (hetters) are destroying fandom by tying the hands of hetters (slashers) or trolling them off the net?

So today, I'm reading comments and run across a thread and then think, huh. Wow. Do you know what this debate could use? Some actual *facts*.

So here's the actual question I want asked next time the word 'bias' is thrown around anywhere. Because sometimes, I've kind of thought that fandom sometimes might work on the concept that if someone says something enough, or believes it enough, and says it to enough people in enough places, it has to be true.

Can you prove it?

The next time someone, anyone, makes a bias statement, I want *math*. I want percentages. I want a full count and documentation of the places the count was done, who double checked it. Because I want to know when anyone uses the word bias in regards to a group, a community, a person, they're using it as more than a way to get quick sympathy and score points. If you're pissed enough with fandom to see a bias and pissed enough to use the word, and pissed enough to rouse up your buddies, then you are plenty energetic enough to get yourself to counting. You know, I did it? Okay, with help. But Christ, *nine hundred something stories. So we did it. And I bet just about anyone else can do it too.

* Or in femmeslashes case--I really don't have a good way to put that one. Hmm. Give me a couple of hours. Think *spirit*, not letter.

[identity profile] ceteramisto.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
This is just freaky. I found your post just after I went through every issue of the sga_newsletter form July 23 through Agust 1 and counted how many links there were for fanfiction for each pairing. McKay /Sheppard was the most with 100 links, Sheppard/Weir was second with 21, Sheppard/Beckett was third with 6.

If anyone is interested I'm willing to make a post in my lj with more details. I'm already planning to go through the newletter's memories to count how many links there are for each pairing.

[identity profile] eternallycait.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 05:03 am (UTC)(link)
That's really interesting. See, I would have thought that Sheppard/Beckett wouldn't be third - I thought it would be John/Teyla, easily. And yet you don't hear as much from the Schecket? fans. It's also interesting to see what otps make their presecence strongly known.

[identity profile] tainted-phial.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
Really? John/Teyla? I don't know if it is just what I watch* but I had no idea there even was a part of fandom that had John/Teyla as an OTP and followed it. I seen a fic here and there but it seems odd. However Sheppard/Beckett, from viewing SGA Newsletter, pops up often in small numbers.

*With very limited time and a strong bias towards slash. In SGA I can't recall the last het fic I read.

[identity profile] eternallycait.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
I'm a John/Rodney shipper and 99% of my flist are J/R as well. I didn't even really think about John/Carson at all (but maybe that's because I love Carson, but see him as a completely nonthreatening, nonsexual being.) I don't see much JOhn/Teyla, but then I often hear about them, they sort of exist peripherally and seem to have a bigger impact on fandom? People reference them more often?
Or maybe I'm just talking nonsense.

[identity profile] tainted-phial.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 06:04 am (UTC)(link)
I see Carson in the same way and I dislike reading john/carson but it always seems to show up. Maybe because of the onscreen Teyla/John kiss people think/talk about them more? I tend to separate the show from fandom a lot more than it seems others do. I never really think about teyla/john except in a john/rodney/teyla/ronnon team fic. If you would have asked me, I had the impression that teyla/ronnon was the most popular teyla ship. Of course that could be because of McShep fics with a secondary pairing(teyla/ronnon), the one line mention of them being together, where john isn't available, maybe?

[identity profile] eternallycait.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 06:10 am (UTC)(link)
I like Teyla/Ronon too! Of course, I also like Ronon/Elizabeth so maybe I just want to find him a good woman.

I think sometimes I'll watch the show and be all "Oooh the John/Teyla's will be happy tonight" and so when it gets mentioned I feel all smug about my opinion being confirmed. Maybe it's also because it could possibly become canon that people are more on the lookout for it. Of course, John/Rodney is already canon, so there you go.

[identity profile] tainted-phial.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 06:15 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, Ronnon needs somebody to love.


[identity profile] ceteramisto.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 10:48 am (UTC)(link)
These numbers were just for a 10-day period. John/Teyla was tied with McKay/Beckett for fourth with 5 links. Though looking st the memories number John/Teyla is fourth behind McKay/Sheppard, Sheppard/Weir, and McKay/Beckett. Sheppard/Beckett is sixth. I personally think that Sheppard/Beckett is just on an upswing lately.
ext_108: Jules from Psych saying "You guys are thinking about cupcakes, aren't you?" (atlantis: OT4 / new adventures in hi-fi)

[identity profile] liviapenn.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)

Just FYI, here's actually two J/T comms out there: [livejournal.com profile] john_teyla and [livejournal.com profile] sheppard_teyla, watched by 56 and 88 people respectively.

(Just for contrast, the gen-het-and-slash-friendly [livejournal.com profile] teylafen comm has 80 watchers, and [livejournal.com profile] john_elizabeth has 444 watchers.)
ext_108: Jules from Psych saying "You guys are thinking about cupcakes, aren't you?" (atlantis: cadman = space marine)

[identity profile] liviapenn.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 04:59 pm (UTC)(link)

Also: [livejournal.com profile] liz_ronon currently has 88 watchers, and [livejournal.com profile] mckay_cadman has 56. (It is weird that these same two numbers keep popping up, but there you are!)
ext_108: Jules from Psych saying "You guys are thinking about cupcakes, aren't you?" (atlantis: ronon was had at rarrrr)

[identity profile] liviapenn.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 05:10 pm (UTC)(link)

And, [livejournal.com profile] ronon_teyla has 148 watchers.

[identity profile] mecurtin.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)
The Sheppard/Beckett thing is IMHO a statistical anomaly, because there's one (or two?) people who are writing right now. It's one of those waves. On Wraithbait (which cover a much longer range of time) McKay/Beckett is the second most popular slash pairing, and almost as popular as Weir/Sheppard. Which actually makes me think that the Weir/Sheppard people are archiving somewhere else, or not at all, because there should be more W/S stories than that: currently Wraithbait has only 166 W/S, compared to 1350 McShepOMG.
trobadora: (Default)

[personal profile] trobadora 2006-08-02 08:45 am (UTC)(link)
The newsletter memories actually give raw numbers - look here:
http://www.livejournal.com/tools/memories.bml?user=sga_newsletter

[identity profile] ceteramisto.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 10:42 am (UTC)(link)
I'd forgotten that about that because I'd clicked the memories for individual pairings directly from the layout not the userinfo. However, there are some interesting details to be found in the specific categories such as multi-part stories, multi-pairing stories, competing pairing stories, and threesomes.

I know what I'm going to be doing with my spare time for the immediate future. I'm finding this whole thing fascinating. It's also a good reason for me to finally figure out how to use my database program.
trobadora: (Default)

[personal profile] trobadora 2006-08-02 11:28 am (UTC)(link)
You've got a lot of work ahead of you, then. But I'm looking forward to the results!

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
*grins* Oh awesome. I love you. going to check that out after work.

I love it. Proof. We're in a freaking sci-fi fandom. We should know to do this!

[identity profile] ceteramisto.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
I just finished compiling the information and writing the post. Here's a link to the post. (http://ceteramisto.livejournal.com/6304.html)

[identity profile] mice1900.livejournal.com 2006-08-02 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
And this does, of course, play into my assertion that John/Rodney is the pairing that ate the fandom ;)