ext_19918 ([identity profile] ladyflowdi.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] seperis 2006-09-23 02:13 pm (UTC)

we decided that Flanigan really doesn't have that great a range -- he's essentially the same guy in every role -- but that Flanigan's range and the role of John Sheppard were very good fits. There was a lot of overlap. Everything that Sheppard needed to do, Flanigan could do. Or near enough. And that was good enough. This stuff ain't Shakespeare.

I was going to post but you hit exactly what I was going to say right on the head. JF doesn't have as much experience in film work as DH does, so maybe hasn't honed his acting as well, but -- it doesn't matter. JF is perfect as Sheppard and vice versa, so it *works*. I kinda love it.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting