2014-08-24 12:03 am (UTC)
*dies laughing*

I think when it comes to the psychology of learning, there's too much of an emphasis on treating outlier like a problem, or assuming there's outlier and not a spectrum. This is an Education Kinsey, I think--more people gravitate toward center on either side, and so they're invisible unless you really know what you're looking for and only the painfully obvious can really be seen yet.

I mean, I was in special ed in part of first grade because of my reading level and I was IQ tested to see if I should be there permanently. Knowing what I know now about IQ tests and what they actually test, that's interesting to me not because I came out of there with the '...oh, yeah, we were wrong and how' but because there was a legitimate reason I was in that class in the first place. I wasn't processing written language acquisition at the minimum for first grade, which is a very low bar here, and then very abruptly--and I do mean abruptly--it was fixed by no one and nothing in class. That happened a lot in my formal education and happens to this day when I learn anything.

For me, I wonder in this case not if I would have had a problem with whole word, but where it would have showed up.
From:
Anonymous (will be screened)
OpenID (will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.
October 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2016